11
tom
Re: New low for scammers of Xoops
  • 2006/1/26 20:30

  • tom

  • Friend of XOOPS

  • Posts: 1359

  • Since: 2002/9/21


Mongral,

Good point, I signed up for a demo and it appeared to be a fairly old version of XOOPS being used, but I maybe wrong.

Register on the demo and see for yourself.
Kind Regards.
Tom

http://bassmanthemes.com
http://www.xoopslance.com

12
Herko
Re: New low for scammers of Xoops
  • 2006/1/26 20:53

  • Herko

  • XOOPS is my life!

  • Posts: 4238

  • Since: 2002/2/4 1


They can sell XOOPS, but only under the terms of the GPL. This means two things: they have to keep the credits in the files intact, *and* they cannot restrict what you do with the code they distribute. If they only host the site, they're not distributing it, so they are not bound by the non-restrictions from the copyleft of the GPL. Crafty, but morally not good.

I have examples of XOOPS codes that ar being sold as other softwares, with full restrictions tho...

Hypothetically, what do you feel we should do when we find a real case of misuse and GPL violation? How should we go about this?

Herko

13
tom
Re: New low for scammers of Xoops
  • 2006/1/26 21:39

  • tom

  • Friend of XOOPS

  • Posts: 1359

  • Since: 2002/9/21


I have no issues with people making money off xoops, nor selling themes, modules, etc, but they seem to have masked the fact it's xoops, as you say this is legal, but seems wrong.

Herko with regards to your comment, is there not some kind of legal way to deal with true offenders?

I'm not an expert on the law.

Could you not create a blacklisted page type thing, which make examples of them along with other links to those sites which are moral so users can choose a trusted partner which offers services over those which are not quiet so moral.
Kind Regards.
Tom

http://bassmanthemes.com
http://www.xoopslance.com

14
netshark
Re: New low for scammers of Xoops
  • 2006/1/27 0:10

  • netshark

  • Just popping in

  • Posts: 3

  • Since: 2005/3/26


Before distributing some "SHAME !!!" and your personal ideas about open source software, please read and inform yourself about the GNU General Public License.

This is the complete text. Please think about the marked text in particular.

GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE Version 2, June 1991

Copyright (C) 1989, 1991 Free Software Foundation, Inc. 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307 USA Everyone is permitted to copy and distribute verbatim copies of this license document, but changing it is not allowed.

Preamble

The licenses for most software are designed to take away your freedom to share and change it. By contrast, the GNU General Public License is intended to guarantee your freedom to share and change free software--to make sure the software is free for all its users. This General Public License applies to most of the Free Software Foundation's software and to any other program whose authors commit to using it. (Some other Free Software Foundation software is covered by the GNU Library General Public License instead.) You can apply it to your programs, too.


VVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVV
When we speak of free software, we are referring to freedom, not price. Our General Public Licenses are designed to make sure that you have the freedom to distribute copies of free software (and charge for this service if you wish), that you receive source code or can get it if you want it, that you can change the software or use pieces of it in new free programs; and that you know you can do these things.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

To protect your rights, we need to make restrictions that forbid anyone to deny you these rights or to ask you to surrender the rights. These restrictions translate to certain responsibilities for you if you distribute copies of the software, or if you modify it.

For example, if you distribute copies of such a program, whether gratis or for a fee, you must give the recipients all the rights that you have. You must make sure that they, too, receive or can get the source code. And you must show them these terms so they know their rights.

We protect your rights with two steps: (1) copyright the software, and (2) offer you this license which gives you legal permission to copy, distribute and/or modify the software.

Also, for each author's protection and ours, we want to make certain that everyone understands that there is no warranty for this free software. If the software is modified by someone else and passed on, we want its recipients to know that what they have is not the original, so that any problems introduced by others will not reflect on the original authors' reputations.

Finally, any free program is threatened constantly by software patents. We wish to avoid the danger that redistributors of a free program will individually obtain patent licenses, in effect making the program proprietary. To prevent this, we have made it clear that any patent must be licensed for everyone's free use or not licensed at all.

The precise terms and conditions for copying, distribution and modification follow.

GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR COPYING, DISTRIBUTION AND MODIFICATION

0. This License applies to any program or other work which contains a notice placed by the copyright holder saying it may be distributed under the terms of this General Public License. The "Program", below, refers to any such program or work, and a "work based on the Program" means either the Program or any derivative work under copyright law: that is to say, a work containing the Program or a portion of it, either verbatim or with modifications and/or translated into another language. (Hereinafter, translation is included without limitation in the term "modification".) Each licensee is addressed as "you".

Activities other than copying, distribution and modification are not covered by this License; they are outside its scope. The act of running the Program is not restricted, and the output from the Program is covered only if its contents constitute a work based on the Program (independent of having been made by running the Program). Whether that is true depends on what the Program does.

1. You may copy and distribute verbatim copies of the Program's source code as you receive it, in any medium, provided that you conspicuously and appropriately publish on each copy an appropriate copyright notice and disclaimer of warranty; keep intact all the notices that refer to this License and to the absence of any warranty; and give any other recipients of the Program a copy of this License along with the Program.

VVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVV

You may charge a fee for the physical act of transferring a copy, and you may at your option offer warranty protection in exchange for a fee.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

2. You may modify your copy or copies of the Program or any portion of it, thus forming a work based on the Program, and copy and distribute such modifications or work under the terms of Section 1 above, provided that you also meet all of these conditions:

a) You must cause the modified files to carry prominent notices stating that you changed the files and the date of any change.

b) You must cause any work that you distribute or publish, that in whole or in part contains or is derived from the Program or any part thereof, to be licensed as a whole at no charge to all third parties under the terms of this License.

c) If the modified program normally reads commands interactively when run, you must cause it, when started running for such interactive use in the most ordinary way, to print or display an announcement including an appropriate copyright notice and a notice that there is no warranty (or else, saying that you provide a warranty) and that users may redistribute the program under these conditions, and telling the user how to view a copy of this License. (Exception: if the Program itself is interactive but does not normally print such an announcement, your work based on the Program is not required to print an announcement.)

These requirements apply to the modified work as a whole. If identifiable sections of that work are not derived from the Program, and can be reasonably considered independent and separate works in themselves, then this License, and its terms, do not apply to those sections when you distribute them as separate works. But when you distribute the same sections as part of a whole which is a work based on the Program, the distribution of the whole must be on the terms of this License, whose permissions for other licensees extend to the entire whole, and thus to each and every part regardless of who wrote it.

Thus, it is not the intent of this section to claim rights or contest your rights to work written entirely by you; rather, the intent is to exercise the right to control the distribution of derivative or collective works based on the Program.

In addition, mere aggregation of another work not based on the Program with the Program (or with a work based on the Program) on a volume of a storage or distribution medium does not bring the other work under the scope of this License.

3. You may copy and distribute the Program (or a work based on it, under Section 2) in object code or executable form under the terms of Sections 1 and 2 above provided that you also do one of the following:

a) Accompany it with the complete corresponding machine-readable source code, which must be distributed under the terms of Sections 1 and 2 above on a medium customarily used for software interchange; or,

b) Accompany it with a written offer, valid for at least three years, to give any third party, for a charge no more than your cost of physically performing source distribution, a complete machine-readable copy of the corresponding source code, to be distributed under the terms of Sections 1 and 2 above on a medium customarily used for software interchange; or,

c) Accompany it with the information you received as to the offer to distribute corresponding source code. (This alternative is allowed only for noncommercial distribution and only if you received the program in object code or executable form with such an offer, in accord with Subsection b above.)

The source code for a work means the preferred form of the work for making modifications to it. For an executable work, complete source code means all the source code for all modules it contains, plus any associated interface definition files, plus the scripts used to control compilation and installation of the executable. However, as a special exception, the source code distributed need not include anything that is normally distributed (in either source or binary form) with the major components (compiler, kernel, and so on) of the operating system on which the executable runs, unless that component itself accompanies the executable.

If distribution of executable or object code is made by offering access to copy from a designated place, then offering equivalent access to copy the source code from the same place counts as distribution of the source code, even though third parties are not compelled to copy the source along with the object code.

4. You may not copy, modify, sublicense, or distribute the Program except as expressly provided under this License. Any attempt otherwise to copy, modify, sublicense or distribute the Program is void, and will automatically terminate your rights under this License. However, parties who have received copies, or rights, from you under this License will not have their licenses terminated so long as such parties remain in full compliance.

5. You are not required to accept this License, since you have not signed it. However, nothing else grants you permission to modify or distribute the Program or its derivative works. These actions are prohibited by law if you do not accept this License. Therefore, by modifying or distributing the Program (or any work based on the Program), you indicate your acceptance of this License to do so, and all its terms and conditions for copying, distributing or modifying the Program or works based on it.

6. Each time you redistribute the Program (or any work based on the Program), the recipient automatically receives a license from the original licensor to copy, distribute or modify the Program subject to these terms and conditions. You may not impose any further restrictions on the recipients' exercise of the rights granted herein. You are not responsible for enforcing compliance by third parties to this License.

7. If, as a consequence of a court judgment or allegation of patent infringement or for any other reason (not limited to patent issues), conditions are imposed on you (whether by court order, agreement or otherwise) that contradict the conditions of this License, they do not excuse you from the conditions of this License. If you cannot distribute so as to satisfy simultaneously your obligations under this License and any other pertinent obligations, then as a consequence you may not distribute the Program at all. For example, if a patent license would not permit royalty-free redistribution of the Program by all those who receive copies directly or indirectly through you, then the only way you could satisfy both it and this License would be to refrain entirely from distribution of the Program.

If any portion of this section is held invalid or unenforceable under any particular circumstance, the balance of the section is intended to apply and the section as a whole is intended to apply in other circumstances.

It is not the purpose of this section to induce you to infringe any patents or other property right claims or to contest validity of any such claims; this section has the sole purpose of protecting the integrity of the free software distribution system, which is implemented by public license practices. Many people have made generous contributions to the wide range of software distributed through that system in reliance on consistent application of that system; it is up to the author/donor to decide if he or she is willing to distribute software through any other system and a licensee cannot impose that choice.

This section is intended to make thoroughly clear what is believed to be a consequence of the rest of this License.

8. If the distribution and/or use of the Program is restricted in certain countries either by patents or by copyrighted interfaces, the original copyright holder who places the Program under this License may add an explicit geographical distribution limitation excluding those countries, so that distribution is permitted only in or among countries not thus excluded. In such case, this License incorporates the limitation as if written in the body of this License.

9. The Free Software Foundation may publish revised and/or new versions of the General Public License from time to time. Such new versions will be similar in spirit to the present version, but may differ in detail to address new problems or concerns.

Each version is given a distinguishing version number. If the Program specifies a version number of this License which applies to it and "any later version", you have the option of following the terms and conditions either of that version or of any later version published by the Free Software Foundation. If the Program does not specify a version number of this License, you may choose any version ever published by the Free Software Foundation.

10. If you wish to incorporate parts of the Program into other free programs whose distribution conditions are different, write to the author to ask for permission. For software which is copyrighted by the Free Software Foundation, write to the Free Software Foundation; we sometimes make exceptions for this. Our decision will be guided by the two goals of preserving the free status of all derivatives of our free software and of promoting the sharing and reuse of software generally.

NO WARRANTY

11. BECAUSE THE PROGRAM IS LICENSED FREE OF CHARGE, THERE IS NO WARRANTY FOR THE PROGRAM, TO THE EXTENT PERMITTED BY APPLICABLE LAW. EXCEPT WHEN OTHERWISE STATED IN WRITING THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND/OR OTHER PARTIES PROVIDE THE PROGRAM "AS IS" WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EITHER EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. THE ENTIRE RISK AS TO THE QUALITY AND PERFORMANCE OF THE PROGRAM IS WITH YOU. SHOULD THE PROGRAM PROVE DEFECTIVE, YOU ASSUME THE COST OF ALL NECESSARY SERVICING, REPAIR OR CORRECTION.

12. IN NO EVENT UNLESS REQUIRED BY APPLICABLE LAW OR AGREED TO IN WRITING WILL ANY COPYRIGHT HOLDER, OR ANY OTHER PARTY WHO MAY MODIFY AND/OR REDISTRIBUTE THE PROGRAM AS PERMITTED ABOVE, BE LIABLE TO YOU FOR DAMAGES, INCLUDING ANY GENERAL, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES ARISING OUT OF THE USE OR INABILITY TO USE THE PROGRAM (INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO LOSS OF DATA OR DATA BEING RENDERED INACCURATE OR LOSSES SUSTAINED BY YOU OR THIRD PARTIES OR A FAILURE OF THE PROGRAM TO OPERATE WITH ANY OTHER PROGRAMS), EVEN IF SUCH HOLDER OR OTHER PARTY HAS BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES.

END OF TERMS AND CONDITIONS


1) They offer professional installation, (which is great for those that do not know how to install a MySQL driven site)

2) They offer support - (which are allowed to do and to charge for this)

3) They are offering free hosting for 1 year -- (what a deal!)

They also state on the listing that the code is based on "open source". So, where is the "crafty part" there? If there were crafty would they just not mention it?

Also, the code has been changed ALOT and the credits remain intact for both the GPL as well as the original authors credits at the top of each file.

They also distribute the software to the clients in zip format (also allowed under the GPL)

So now I suppose your local Best Buy store is also breaking the law by providing Linux on cd with a "pretty box" Is that crafty too?

15
marcan
Re: New low for scammers of Xoops
  • 2006/1/27 1:09

  • marcan

  • Just can't stay away

  • Posts: 824

  • Since: 2003/10/8


netshark, calm down I beleive this discussion isa very calm discussion and nobody insulted nobody...

I beleive we all agreed that they are not broking any law and they comply to the GPL. No doubt about that.

The only thing we are saying is that the wording could have been better. When you read their ads, it seems like you are actually buying the software, which is not the case. You are buying the installation, the services, the hosting etc...

Cheers !
.:: marcan (aka mal aka Marc-André) ::.
.:: Open Source :: The SmartFactory ::.
.:: XOOPS Professional Services :: INBOX International ::.

16
netshark
Re: New low for scammers of Xoops
  • 2006/1/27 1:18

  • netshark

  • Just popping in

  • Posts: 3

  • Since: 2005/3/26


Quote:

marcan wrote:
netshark, calm down I beleive this discussion isa very calm discussion and nobody insulted nobody...

I beleive we all agreed that they are not broking any law and they comply to the GPL. No doubt about that.

The only thing we are saying is that the wording could have been better. When you read their ads, it seems like you are actually buying the software, which is not the case. You are buying the installation, the services, the hosting etc...

Cheers !


Your right. I just get so fed up with people that never bother to read the GPL. They all have this idea on what it means but they never actually read the GPL. They then make claims of things like that is in the title "New low for scammers of Xoops"

I am sorry for the rant It over now.....

Keep up the good work guys. I have finished some new modules I will be submitting to the modules repository later on tomorrow I also have an awsome "flash" based theme that I want to submit however I am not sure on how secure it is to use flash with Xoops.

17
mongrel
Re: New low for scammers of Xoops
  • 2006/1/27 4:57

  • mongrel

  • Just popping in

  • Posts: 62

  • Since: 2005/1/15


Quote:

Herko Coomans wrote:
Hypothetically, what do you feel we should do when we find a real case of misuse and GPL violation? How should we go about this?

Given the Global reach of XOOPs, it seems likely that someone, somewhere is doing that very thing. Enforcing compliance can be quite difficult, especially if the seller/installer is a fly-by-night operation. While forming a legal committee and/or fund is probably premature, some attempt at forming a policy regarding license may not be a bad idea.

One way to start would be with the identification of players in this hypothetical case:

-XOOPs
-The Seller
-The Customer
-The governing authority with jurisdiction in the Sellers physical location
-Any appropriate national/international organizations to whom complaints are to be directed

Some Cease and Desisit Letter might be drafted, perhaps with input from some legal expert:
Quote:

Dear _________

This letter is to inform you that XOOPs has become aware of your non-compliance with the terms of the GPL license in connection with the sale of XXX to Seller XXX on XX/XX/XX.

These are terms to which you agreed when you...

In accordance with the ..., you are hereby required to Cease and Desist from...

Should you fail to honor these terms, XOOPs will take X action.

Copies of this letter have been provided to XXX, YYY, and ZZZ. All inquiries regarding this matter should be directed to X.

Sincerely,
XOOPs


The buyer might be notified to be sure that they are made aware that they purchased something they could have gotten for "free."

I don't know what legal recourse is available in a situation like this, should it occur, but surely there is a precedent for it or something very similar.

Can it be argued that the XOOPs community suffers any actual damages from the sale of the system outside compliance with the license? Maybe yes, maybe no. It is on one hand a matter of giving credit where credit is due and on the other, as I said earlier, protecting the reputation of XOOPs from unjustified harm due to the actions of rogue "installers."
Improve the time.

18
MadFish
Re: New low for scammers of Xoops
  • 2006/1/27 6:30

  • MadFish

  • Friend of XOOPS

  • Posts: 1056

  • Since: 2003/9/27


Quote:
Hypothetically, what do you feel we should do when we find a real case of misuse and GPL violation? How should we go about this?


If it looks intentional, personally I'd like to see a letter sent to them from the XOOPS Foundation.

Just a thought - but if someone does include GPL code in a proprietary non-GPL product, can they continue to claim copyright over their own product? Could anyone (hypothetically) start distributing the 'proprietary' software on the basis that it contained GPL code?

That might make a lot of companies think twice.

19
Herko
Re: New low for scammers of Xoops
  • 2006/1/27 7:46

  • Herko

  • XOOPS is my life!

  • Posts: 4238

  • Since: 2002/2/4 1


Quote:

MadFish wrote:
Just a thought - but if someone does include GPL code in a proprietary non-GPL product, can they continue to claim copyright over their own product? Could anyone (hypothetically) start distributing the 'proprietary' software on the basis that it contained GPL code?


The GPL is very clear on this, actually. The GPL does not transfer the IP rights (intellectual property rights, such as the copyright) from the original author at all. The code is owned at all times by the author. But, by rightfully releasing that code under the terms of the GPL, the author grants everyone a non-discriminatory, everlasting, non-revokable *licence* to use the code under the terms described.
In other words, if you're not the copyright owner of the code, you cannot grant others this license. That protects closed code from being released under the terms of the GPL unwillingly.
The other way round is another matter tho. Open code distributed as closed and with restrictions that the GPL doesn't allow, is more difficult to find and fight.
GNU/FSF has an abuse e-mail address, but we'll need solid proof of course. And even if we have a solid cas, what to do with it. Sue? Claim damages? I think a cease and desist letter is a good start, but what if they don't stop? (note that I'm referring to a hypothetical case where there is a clear violation of the terms of the GPL!!) Send in the lawyers, a time consuming and expensive measure, and definately not our core business. What about the modifications they have made? There's a good chance they legally should be open sourced as GPL (as a derrived work of XOOPS), but do we force that, in effect create a fork?
I think this is not an easy thing to determine, as there are many factors to take into consideration. But I'm keen to hear everyone's thoughts and suggestions

Herko

20
marcan
Re: New low for scammers of Xoops
  • 2006/1/27 14:14

  • marcan

  • Just can't stay away

  • Posts: 824

  • Since: 2003/10/8


@netshark:
Quote:
I just get so fed up with people that never bother to read the GPL. They all have this idea on what it means but they never actually read the GPL.

I agree with you. Most people don't know or understand the GPL. I agree it may be frustrating sometimes...

@mongrel:
Quote:
Given the Global reach of XOOPs, it seems likely that someone, somewhere is doing that very thing. Enforcing compliance can be quite difficult, especially if the seller/installer is a fly-by-night operation.

I also agree with you. It is obvious that people around the world are doing this at this very moment. Fighting those people would require A LOT of energy for very little gain...

I understand it's frusrtating... But it's life ! Some people care about the others, and other people don't. We have accept that.

Law actions agains those people is highly improbable as we don't have the money nor the time to do it.

My thought on this is yes, we can send them a letter an notify the GPL organisation but that's it. After that, let's focus on what we do best : creating the best CMS around !

Cheers !
.:: marcan (aka mal aka Marc-André) ::.
.:: Open Source :: The SmartFactory ::.
.:: XOOPS Professional Services :: INBOX International ::.

Login

Who's Online

267 user(s) are online (175 user(s) are browsing Support Forums)


Members: 0


Guests: 267


more...

Donat-O-Meter

Stats
Goal: $100.00
Due Date: May 31
Gross Amount: $0.00
Net Balance: $0.00
Left to go: $100.00
Make donations with PayPal!

Latest GitHub Commits