471
frankblack
Re: search problem
  • 2005/9/22 19:00

  • frankblack

  • Just can't stay away

  • Posts: 830

  • Since: 2005/6/13


Unfortunately sections isn't searchable. But making the module is not too difficult. Look at the module news 1.1 how this is done. The xoops_version.php of sections must be changed. If hassearch has the value 1 it means that the module is searchable. This must be followed by a call to a function to tell what in sections is searchable. Normally the search-file is called search.inc.php and sits in the include-folder of the module.

Take the search.inc.php of news 1.1 and adapt it to your needs.



472
frankblack
Re: How to pimp xoopsConfig easily?
  • 2005/9/14 18:54

  • frankblack

  • Just can't stay away

  • Posts: 830

  • Since: 2005/6/13


Quote:
One of the things I changed in XOOPS 2.2


Excellent! One more reason to upgrade in the near future!!

Maybe interesting for others, is the Poodle Predictor

What it is doing:
Quote:
Enter your URL above to see what your site will look like in search-engine results, for instance www.evolt.org
See how search-engine friendly your site is, can the spider crawl it easily? Will it get good rankings?



473
frankblack
Re: How to pimp xoopsConfig easily?
  • 2005/9/14 18:47

  • frankblack

  • Just can't stay away

  • Posts: 830

  • Since: 2005/6/13


Misunderstanding No. 2! LOL

Quote:
can't see how that routine could be simpler when it comes to the xoopsConfig array.


I don't see flaws in the code either (but what I do know). I only meant that changing the database-table is a dirty way to achieve what I want.

So I was hoping for a more elegant way of hacking. I was puzzled that the system-configs are not part of their xoops_version.php.



474
frankblack
Re: How to pimp xoopsConfig easily?
  • 2005/9/14 18:37

  • frankblack

  • Just can't stay away

  • Posts: 830

  • Since: 2005/6/13


Quote:
Am I misunderstanding your problem?


Noooooo, damn my English!

With query I meant that I compare the HTTP_USER_AGENTs with the value of the field. To make it complete this is what I changed in common.php:

session_name("s");
$spiders $xoopsConfig['nobotsession'];
$from_spider=FALSE
foreach(
$spiders as $val
{
if (
eregi($val$_SERVER["HTTP_USER_AGENT"])) 

$from_spider=TRUE
break; 


// Session 
if(!$from_spidersession_start();



475
frankblack
How to pimp xoopsConfig easily?
  • 2005/9/14 18:23

  • frankblack

  • Just can't stay away

  • Posts: 830

  • Since: 2005/6/13


I wonder if there are any other possibilities extending the system preferences in 2.0.13.1?

I added an extra field to the config-table. I made an extra-field for preventing bots getting a SESSION-ID when a shop is installed. I set up an array with all known bots and added an query to common.php before a session would be started.

Maybe I am thinking too complicated?



476
frankblack
Re: myxoops.org hacked!
  • 2005/9/7 19:01

  • frankblack

  • Just can't stay away

  • Posts: 830

  • Since: 2005/6/13


Quote:
Neither Newbb 2.* nor CBB 1.*/2.* has the vulnerability.


Good to know, but this makes me fear that the attacker had another hole. And no, Protector wasn't installed. The Protector was installed, but later deinstalled because of problems.



477
frankblack
Re: myxoops.org hacked!
  • 2005/9/7 15:36

  • frankblack

  • Just can't stay away

  • Posts: 830

  • Since: 2005/6/13


So I have to switch the forum (from newbb 2.02) to a safer version. BUT does cbb1.14 has the same vulnerabilities?



478
frankblack
Re: How many splits can XOOPS bear?
  • 2005/9/5 11:30

  • frankblack

  • Just can't stay away

  • Posts: 830

  • Since: 2005/6/13


Perhaps my posts had this terrible German accent, that my point wasn't clear at all.

Quote:
And forks because of "ancient" bugs?


I did not mean that! I looked at the code and found some old stuff that hasn't been wiped out. What I meant was, that the CUBE-Code did not blast me off the chair.

Quote:
I'll need a lot more than 15 votes to even take the bait to have a look.


Everything started with protozoa (had to look up this ), so I wanted to point out, that 15 votes are only a start.

All in all I wanted to express my sorrow, that things must not go the forking way. Misunderstandings could be discussed, but I think I am naive and the hands of time cannot be turned back. In the long run XOOPS might lose all Japanese members, which is - in my opinion - a great loss.



479
frankblack
Re: Ventrilo status module error
  • 2005/9/5 10:10

  • frankblack

  • Just can't stay away

  • Posts: 830

  • Since: 2005/6/13


Did I miss something? You are trying to run a XOOPS-module on a NUKE-site?

Puzzled...



480
frankblack
Re: How many splits can XOOPS bear?
  • 2005/9/5 8:46

  • frankblack

  • Just can't stay away

  • Posts: 830

  • Since: 2005/6/13


Quote:
only recent


What about the second post in THIS thread or was it just a threat (sorry for that flat pun) posted by the guy with the thousand nicks?

I do believe that some good developers will migrate to the CUBE then, which will be a terrible loss to XOOPS since the gap between the two versions will widen. Is no communication between both partys possible?

I mean we are all big boys and girls and so discussing things should be possible?




TopTop
« 1 ... 45 46 47 (48) 49 50 51 ... 53 »



Login

Who's Online

223 user(s) are online (148 user(s) are browsing Support Forums)


Members: 0


Guests: 223


more...

Donat-O-Meter

Stats
Goal: $100.00
Due Date: Apr 30
Gross Amount: $0.00
Net Balance: $0.00
Left to go: $100.00
Make donations with PayPal!

Latest GitHub Commits