xoops forums

irmtfan

Module Developer
Posted on: 2012/9/5 4:29
irmtfan
irmtfan (Show more)
Module Developer
Posts: 3419
Since: 2003/12/7
#51

Re: XOOPS 2.6.0 Alpha 1 Testing

amazing,
Thank you Zyspec. it is very needed.
Its good to have a brief explanation of those API in column D.
So module developers will understand Xoops API better.

kris_fr

Theme Designer
Posted on: 2012/9/5 18:44
kris_fr
kris_fr (Show more)
Theme Designer
Posts: 1009
Since: 2005/12/31
#52

Re: XOOPS 2.6.0 Alpha 1 Testing

deprecated list -> http://dev.xoofoo.org/dev_xoops_260a1/d9/d76/a02526.html
class hierachy (and more) -> http://dev.xoofoo.org/dev_xoops_260a1/inherits.html

zyspec

Module Developer
Posted on: 2012/9/5 18:55
zyspec
zyspec (Show more)
Module Developer
Posts: 1018
Since: 2004/9/21
#53

Re: XOOPS 2.6.0 Alpha 1 Testing

Thanks kris_fr!

Roby73

Friend of XOOPS
Posted on: 2012/9/5 22:33
Roby73
Roby73 (Show more)
Friend of XOOPS
Posts: 262
Since: 2011/6/15
#54

Re: XOOPS 2.6.0 Alpha 1 Testing

Tanks

tatane

Just can't stay away
Posted on: 2012/9/7 17:29
tatane
tatane (Show more)
Just can't stay away
Posts: 649
Since: 2008/5/6 1
#55

Re: XOOPS 2.6.0 Alpha 1 Testing

Hello,
Today many CMS use libraries such as Gravatar avatar
Would it be possible to integrate this system in version 2.6 Xoops ?

irmtfan

Module Developer
Posted on: 2012/9/8 5:43
irmtfan
irmtfan (Show more)
Module Developer
Posts: 3419
Since: 2003/12/7
#56

Re: XOOPS 2.6.0 Alpha 1 Testing

thanks kris_fr.
I hope you clould be involved more in helping core team to document a theme standards for xoops 2.6.0
It is very needed too.

Gravatar is good feature to add.
btw implement globalize features like this make some issues for some countries. please add these features as optional.
anyway please send it to the sf.net tracker.

culex

Module Developer
Posted on: 2012/9/8 15:51
culex
culex (Show more)
Module Developer
Posts: 705
Since: 2004/9/23
#57

Re: XOOPS 2.6.0 Alpha 1 Testing

Quote:


Mamba Quote: I can confirm that blocks are not draggable. Hmm, don't have these problems with PHP 5.3.15 and PHP 5.4.5 Can somebody else confirm the issues, and specify the platform they are using?


It's due to double including jquery.ui.

One inclusion from /media/jquery/plugins/ wich is UI version 1.70 AND another including from /media/plugins/ui/ wich is the new ui version 1.83...

Problem is the old overwrites the new in the header giving dom error "d is undefined" in the browser..

Solution is to locate
addScript($xoops->url('/media/jquery/plugins/jquery.ui.js'));


and replace with
addScript($xoops->url('/media/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.js'));


in all of the following files
Modules/Banners/index.php
Modules/Banners/banners.php
Modules/Banners/clients.php
Modules/protector/Admin/Advisory.php
Modules/System/Admin/blocksadmin/Main.php
Modules/System/Themes/Default/Default.php

I have posted in tracker also
drag n' drop issue
Programming is like sex:
One mistake and you have to support it for the rest of your life.

irmtfan

Module Developer
Posted on: 2012/9/9 4:19
irmtfan
irmtfan (Show more)
Module Developer
Posts: 3419
Since: 2003/12/7
#58

Re: XOOPS 2.6.0 Alpha 1 Testing

very nice catch culex.
it is better to send this bug fix to the sf.net tracker.
Thank you.

Edit:
my fault!!!
i see you already sent it here:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index. ... roup_id=41586&atid=430840

Thank you again!

Mage

Core Developer
Posted on: 2012/9/9 18:37
Mage
Mage (Show more)
Core Developer
Posts: 167
Since: 2009/8/2 1
#59

Re: XOOPS 2.6.0 Alpha 1 Testing

Thank you for your feedback, I fixed some bugs.

I do not participate much on this topic because my English is very bad but I read your remarks.

Next week I will put on the SVN a new module of contents.

irmtfan

Module Developer
Posted on: 2012/9/10 7:07
irmtfan
irmtfan (Show more)
Module Developer
Posts: 3419
Since: 2003/12/7
#60

Re: XOOPS 2.6.0 Alpha 1 Testing

thank you Mage,
IMO your english is more than sufficient to participate in answering some important questions. Also IMO you can answer in french community forum and there are many french users can interpret your answers.

There are some questions about xoops 2.6.0 that need a core developer response.
eg:
Quote:

but core team dont explain other deprecations.
eg: I cannot understand the below deprecations necessity.
xoops_getModuleHandler to $xoops->getModuleHandler

it needs an explanation because some people like Mamba should put their precious time and change all these functions in all xoops modules to make them compatible with the new 2.6 core.
therefore core team should have a very good reason for that.
Also i may disagree with the below deprecations until i can see a good reason from core team.

for example this one:
xoops_load to XoopsLoad::load

and our widely used function:
formatTimestamp to XoopsLocal::formatTimestamp

I know it is quite easy to change the above methods in calling functions to calling Classes::Functions but i want to know what is wrong with a function like formatTimestamp that we have to change millions of them in the whole xoops modules?


Quote:

Next week I will put on the SVN a new module of contents

brilliant!
it is vitally important task with the highest priority for 2.6.0
once we have a bug free, stable content we can continue and port from all exist content modules