9
Quote:
BlueStocking wrote:
Davidl2,
If you are NOT at this site, Why am I seeing your postings. This is a malicious attact, and you know it, but all it does is point out you are a liar, because you are here. You are not hurting anyone but yourself with this childish behaviour.
This is just my opinion.
But this is what I believe should be in the TOS regarding signatures. Using them to debase or degrade this site or others should be AGAINST the TOS.
I strongly believe that!!!
BS, BlueStockings or whatever anyone wishes to call me, just call me correct on this issue.
Quote:
If you need me - you'll find me at XOOPSinfo.com - and not at this site.
he doesn't say he isn't here.. he says if you need me you'll find me at xoopsinfo.
nobody is needing him, he is free to offer his opinion. my definition of malicious attack must be different to yours
david said nothing malicious whatsoever.
and before you comment, my sig says i'm no longer active, and to clarify on that regard, by active i mean i am not actively providing support!! it's all in the wording, read it how you like.
and also there is nothing derogatory or debasing in my signature or davids. if you think different then point it out where there is a derogatory statement. just because i am saying i will not return till Damaster is banned does not make it derogatory in my book.
de·rog·a·to·ry (d-rg-tôr, -tr)
adj.
1. Disparaging; belittling: a derogatory comment.
2. Tending to detract or diminish.
oh and btw, i use my real name, but nobody stalks me.. stalkers tend to stalk people that provoked being stalked in the 1st place. i agree with crip's post to an extent, it certainly has merit. i'm known as vaughan or monty. neither are made up names, monty is a nickname (all be it mainly an online nickname because most people call me vaughan in real life, monty is taken from my surname which is montgomery)