xoops forums

falcon73

Just popping in
Posted on: 2005/9/28 2:51
falcon73
falcon73 (Show more)
Just popping in
Posts: 36
Since: 2004/10/21
#41

Re: XOOPS 2.2.3 RC2 Snapshot Release

For environment testing, i use:

Environment Details
===================
OS: Microsoft WindowsXP SP2
Local Server: Uniform Server 3.2a
Path to sendmail: /usr/sbin/sendmail
Apache version: Apache 2.0.54
phpMyAdmin: phpMyAdmin-2.6.3-rc1
MySQL version: MySQL 4.1.12a
PHP version: 4.3.11

Installation settings (XOOPS 2.2.3RC2)
=================================
Fresh install: install was flawless!
Use persistent connection?: No
Installed Extended Profiles and Private Messaging
PHPDebug enabled by default (recommended for check and recheck)

NOTES for Modules installation:
==============================
- XOOPS DB Backup and Restore 3.0 (ok)
- XOOPS Protector 2.52 (ok)
- XF Guestbook v2.22 (ok) check for fix problem at this forum
- SmartPartner v1.02 and SmartClient v1.02 from XOOPS Official Module Packages version 1.0(it's ok for core) check for desc by Mithrandir)
- WF-Channel 1.07 (ok!, but cannot use spaw editor)
- Content 0.5 (ok, i suggest for check and recheck at forum for more info little problem)
- Random Quotes 1.0 (ok)
- Sitemap 1.21 (ok)
- Liaise 1.25 (ok, but a little problem when you try to create new "Selections" form element)
- xoopspoll 1.0 (ok)
- News 1.4 (ok)

I'll report more...

And thank you for hard work "Developer and participation team" of this CMS.


Regards,
falcon73

falcon73

Just popping in
Posted on: 2005/9/28 2:57
falcon73
falcon73 (Show more)
Just popping in
Posts: 36
Since: 2004/10/21
#42

Re: XOOPS 2.2.3 RC2 Snapshot Release

Oups..sorry!

Quote:

Environment Details
===================
OS: Microsoft WindowsXP SP2
Local Server: Uniform Server 3.2a
Path to sendmail: /usr/sbin/sendmail
Apache version: Apache 2.0.54
phpMyAdmin: phpMyAdmin-2.6.3-rc1
MySQL version: MySQL 4.1.12a
PHP version: 4.3.11


I copy this text from "JMorris". But not same config

Chappy

Friend of XOOPS
Posted on: 2005/9/28 5:23
Chappy
Chappy (Show more)
Friend of XOOPS
Posts: 456
Since: 2002/12/14
#43

Re: XOOPS 2.2.3 RC2 Snapshot Release

I have been on vacation so am just now working on testing. I am also beginning a new job, so will not have a lot of time. I did some testing tonight.

I have been playing around with the nightlies and using them for toying around with. I thought I would be able to easily upgrade the nightlies with this snapshot, but found that it did not change some things as I expected. The pint is to say that your point about a fresh install is very appropriate. On the play site where I was upgrading the nightlies when I uploaded the snapshot, many things didn't change (even if I updated the system mod and deleted the files in template_c) - I still couldn't delete users, etc. But, on the sandbox where I completely overwrote the files, dropped the database info, and started over with a completely new install, it did fine.

Operating System Linux
Kernel Version 2.6.7-1-grsec
Apache Version 1.3.33 (Unix)
Perl Version 5.8.3
MySQL Version 4.0.24-standard

Create Users - Pass
Delete Users - Pass
Send Mails - Pass
Send Private Messages - Pass
Receive PM - Pass
Registration - Pass
Send Activation Email - Pass
Activate user from activation email - Pass
Deleted user from frontside - as MarcoFr noted earler: Quote:
Delete user account frontside (ext. profile module) failed, even if Allow users to delete their account is set to On --> "Sorry, you dont have the permission to perform this action!" message
I couldn't read the accompanying error message too clearly, the page refreshed to fast, but it has something to do with undefined constant XOOPS_CONF_USER in line, uhh, 89 and a second error, "undefined index:self_delete in user.php line 90". That's proabably all I can check tonight.

Take care,

Mike
MMM...It tastes like chicken! ...

charkra

Just popping in
Posted on: 2005/9/28 15:22
charkra
charkra (Show more)
Just popping in
Posts: 22
Since: 2005/9/14
#44

Re: XOOPS 2.2.3 RC2 Snapshot Release

Can someone instruct me if this is the correct place for highlighting bugs or the sourceforge core development bug report is more appropriate - I have posted in both areas and have not had any response from XOOPS on what else I can do to help track the problem to make it easier for development to rectify the issue. ??

I have found an issue with making a field with being required as part of a user profile - the SQL is always posting : (Carriage Returns inserted to make ledgible)
UPDATE xoops_user_profile_field SET 
field_type 
'select'
field_valuetype 7
field_name 'notify_mode'
field_title 'Default Notification Mode'field_description ''
field_required 0
field_maxlength 0
field_default ''
field_moduleid 1
field_notnull 1
field_edit 1
field_show 1
field_config 0
field_options 'a:3:{i:0;s:33:"Notify me of all selected updates";i:1;s:19:"Notify me only once";i:2;s:48:"Notify me once then disable until I log in again";}'
field_register 
WHERE fieldid 
4


where the field_required is ALWAYS the original field of field_required as opposed to the new set value.

I can manually set the values in the database and then I am able to proceed with the task that I was performing.

If you require addition trace log information please let me know and I will get the information you ask for.

Thanks

Mithrandir

XOOPS is my life!
Posted on: 2005/9/28 16:10
Mithrandir
Mithrandir (Show more)
XOOPS is my life!
Posts: 6320
Since: 2003/6/21
#45

Re: XOOPS 2.2.3 RC2 Snapshot Release

I've found the bug, charkra, and it will be fixed in the final RC2

Can you link me to your sf.net bug report? I looked for it, but couldn't find it.
"When you can flatten entire cities at a whim, a tendency towards quiet reflection and seeing-things-from-the-other-fellow's-point-of-view is seldom necessary."

Cusix Software

charkra

Just popping in
Posted on: 2005/9/28 17:13
charkra
charkra (Show more)
Just popping in
Posts: 22
Since: 2005/9/14
#46

Re: XOOPS 2.2.3 RC2 Snapshot Release

https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func= ... id=1306176&group_id=41586

My username on sourceforge is rlinfoot - sorry about the confusion - just never changed it after my initial registration - last updated by mithyt2.

Cool - thanks for getting back to me on this - if there are other specific items you need tested please let me know as I wish to help with progressing the application.

charkra

Just popping in
Posted on: 2005/9/28 17:34
charkra
charkra (Show more)
Just popping in
Posts: 22
Since: 2005/9/14
#47

Re: XOOPS 2.2.3 RC2 Snapshot Release

I created a user using the email method where the user registers themselves by entering base information and wait for an email to activate. This works fine ... these is a difference between this method and using the ext. profiles method. the ext. profiles does not by default add the "blank.gif" image as the default avatar whereas the self registration does. I do not have any forums loaded yet, but will this form a reference to a non-existant image or will it ignore it completely. I am just thinking about concistancy here :)

charkra

Just popping in
Posted on: 2005/9/28 17:50
charkra
charkra (Show more)
Just popping in
Posts: 22
Since: 2005/9/14
#48

Re: XOOPS 2.2.3 RC2 Snapshot Release

Here are the results I have generated from my initial testing:
mysql Ver 12.22 Distrib 4.0.18
PHP 4.3.11

Pass - User creation admin (ext. profile module)
Pass - User deletion admin (ext. profile module)
Pass - Adding user fields (ext. profile module)
FAIL editing aspects on fields does not always work in respect of activate/deactivate (radio buttons)

Pass - Removing user fields (ext. profile module)
Pass - Searching for users by values of added fields (ext. profile module)
Pass - Send PM (PM module)
Pass - Receive PM (PM module)
Pass - Register user (ext. profile module)
INCONSISTANT Slight difference in end result to using ext.profile method ("blank.gif")

Pass - Send activation email (ext. profile module)
Pass - Activate user from activation email (ext. profile module)
Pass - Add user to group in user edit (ext. profile module)
Pass - Remove user from group in user edit (ext. profile module)

INCOMPLETE- Delete user account frontside (ext. profile module)
I am not sure where this is - can someone please explain or give a hint where to find.

Pass- Add/Edit blocks individually (System -> blocks -> add/edit)
INCONSISTANT User menu does not change whichever location you set it to - appears to always stay left

PENDING - Edit block visibility and positioning in mass (System -> blocks)

I will now start testing with a couple of additional Modules (start with xhelp) and the forums (any suggestion which you would like tested with this release?) I was thinking CBB2.2 ?

nintender

Just popping in
Posted on: 2005/9/28 19:41
nintender
nintender (Show more)
Just popping in
Posts: 19
Since: 2005/6/29
#49

Re: XOOPS 2.2.3 RC2 Snapshot Release

Just read. been busy too:

I've got a non-production version of a site with RC1 installed. Though you recommend fresh install, I have an opportunity to test a fairly established prototype. I'll post my environment/findings and look at issues I have already discovered up till now.

charkra

Just popping in
Posted on: 2005/9/28 20:12
charkra
charkra (Show more)
Just popping in
Posts: 22
Since: 2005/9/14
#50

Re: XOOPS 2.2.3 RC2 Snapshot Release

I have found another issue : I made a user inactive and then tried loggin into the system - Correctly the message the user received was that the account was inactive and it prevented them from connecting in. The Problem:
I was running another module (xhelp) which uses the profile of the user to determine notifications and such. I used the xhelp module to perform a task that would initiate a notification task and the Inactive user was dispatched an email about a task that was being performed. Would the logic be that notifications would still be dispatched if a user was made inactive or disabled? I would hope that in the circumstance that the notifications should be suspended or something similar. I have not raised this as a BUG yet as I cannot track down exactly where the responsibility lies, But I would assume as the notifications still appear active for the inactive user that the problem should be addressed in the profile area - (which comes to the core I assume ) Let me know if you wish me to make it a bug in the sf arena. Thanks