82
what scripts?
who did you talk to?
Ive had very little problems with them for what i use them for 2 costomer sites,
but with broad, ive been pritty good, some time the loading time is a pain, but thats rare.
who did you talk to?
Ive had very little problems with them for what i use them for 2 costomer sites,
but with broad, ive been pritty good, some time the loading time is a pain, but thats rare.
83
Quote:
thats about the size of it.
If you need somthing, just ask, we'll let you know what module will do it
or
do i just download XOOPS latest package and then poke around for modules and let them rip?
thats about the size of it.
If you need somthing, just ask, we'll let you know what module will do it
85
if you create a index.html it will override any and all pages.
it can be placed any where you like. sence it dosnt need XOOPS to work...
...if you need it to rederect in x amount of time in your meta section.
content="5: is a timer, 5 is 5 sec, 3 would be 3 sec, you get the picture?
as for the flash part
in you new index.html page place this code between the body tags.
change the <{$xoops_imageurl}>images/topleft6.swf to your flash file location theres 2 places...
and then change width="418" height="188" to you files sizes.
it can be placed any where you like. sence it dosnt need XOOPS to work...
...if you need it to rederect in x amount of time in your meta section.
<html>
<head>
<title>Redirect to the right page</title>
<META
http-equiv="refresh" content="5;URL=http://www.mysite.me/">
</head>
content="5: is a timer, 5 is 5 sec, 3 would be 3 sec, you get the picture?
as for the flash part
in you new index.html page place this code between the body tags.
change the <{$xoops_imageurl}>images/topleft6.swf to your flash file location theres 2 places...
and then change width="418" height="188" to you files sizes.
<table width="100%">
<tr>
<td><object classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=7,0,19,0" width="418" height="188">
<param name="movie" value="<{$xoops_imageurl}>images/topleft6.swf?q=<? echo rand(1,10000); ?>" />
<param name="quality" value="high" />
<embed src="<{$xoops_imageurl}>images/topleft6.swf?q=<? echo rand(1,10000); ?>" quality="high" pluginspage="http://www.macromedia.com/go/getflashplayer" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="418" height="188"></embed>
</object></td>
</tr>
</table>
86
Did I say mission statement?
Quote:
more to the point...
Quote:
Quote:
Realy????
" IMHO "
https://xoops.org
click on the link, now stand back.
see that... now take the arguments, fighting, bickering, and all the people with little man sidrome, take it all out..
how........... , by starters, lets vote for the powers to be.. XOOPS has a poll module right?
this will solve the whos top dog of xoops. legaly, and personaly for many members. sence they have a say in it.
instead of having it ramed down there throght..
-------------------------------------------
@ BS
frankly Im not sure and dont care if im still part of it.
I handed in the good by & why and never looked back.
Not to be mean or anything, but im not much for a wooping boy.
Quote:
Personaly, and from what ive seen, my oppinion and may other's oppinions arent worth the broadwidth we use..
more to the point...
Quote:
my oppinion
Quote:
What should XOOPS look like to be able to call the project a success?
Realy????
" IMHO "
https://xoops.org
click on the link, now stand back.
see that... now take the arguments, fighting, bickering, and all the people with little man sidrome, take it all out..
how........... , by starters, lets vote for the powers to be.. XOOPS has a poll module right?
this will solve the whos top dog of xoops. legaly, and personaly for many members. sence they have a say in it.
instead of having it ramed down there throght..
-------------------------------------------
@ BS
frankly Im not sure and dont care if im still part of it.
I handed in the good by & why and never looked back.
Not to be mean or anything, but im not much for a wooping boy.
88
Its nice to see MyWebResource.com looking at XOOPS again.
James morris worked alot on XOOPS and did a great of support, it was a sad day and a even bigger loss when he left.
Ive watched him, learning, and understanding how things worked, i was personal upset when he released MyWebResource.com to another person, but i do understand why he did it.
keep checking back, im sure one or two of the XOOPS theme designers will help you.
James morris worked alot on XOOPS and did a great of support, it was a sad day and a even bigger loss when he left.
Ive watched him, learning, and understanding how things worked, i was personal upset when he released MyWebResource.com to another person, but i do understand why he did it.
keep checking back, im sure one or two of the XOOPS theme designers will help you.
90
Quote:
Personaly, and from what ive seen, my oppinion and may other's oppinions arent worth the broadwidth we use..
but i will always be here, and so i will reply. lol
Quote:
• As for modules, they need to have somthing on them and place in a spot that states they are for version 1 or 2
if they are php4 or php5, sql4 sql5 ready, same with the core files. as for the cerrent modules, almost half the modules we have dont work any more due to version change or not php5 ready. for this we need some one that is good in code, and XOOPS core files, and fix the modules, sence thats is one of the larges complaints....
•• As for offical modules and modules added to the "Out of the box" xoops, this was done in the pre 2.0.11 . Its unsure why they desided to remove them, but they did..
••• Put them back in there, update them, you can still offer the packets of "theme" based modules
Just give a new user somthing to tinker with while they start to understand what they have.
• Theme, if we can get some theme designers to take the cerrent themes we do have, and convert them to 2.0.14+
we will have less of a headack, but as said in the modules section, these to should be placed in a spot that states they are for version 1 or 2.
• Generate revenue
Im sure if just these ( above ) are met, many users will chip in some $ to have themes and modules updated and converted to work on the cerrent, and future version of xoops.
granted many versions and XOOPS based modules are built and made free of charge, and those that arnt have been donated to and charged for.
why cant xoops? chage for the use of the name.. or to be a partner, "offical" does mean alot....
If the core team cam out with a killer looking userpanel as a update im sure no one will mine if that hade to pay for it.... say 20 bux....
• The cerrent XOOPS •
now thats a isue in its self....
most of use ( if you have been here around 2005-2006 ) or have asked about the avatars....found out that XOOPS has a bad db..
Well fix it. dont sit on it.
so what, the xoops_config is all messed up..
make a new "updated" XOOPS site on server of off, subdomain or what ever...
tranfer files images,modules,uploads, and any other "needed items", for the data base... tranfer everything but the 3 config files... youll have to set up the site like a new site, but all users are there, messages,folders, files you just have to place the block in the right places and deal with the meta, name,and slogan related things...
( Im cerrently doing this with HelpXoops.info )
its about 85-90% done, i just need to deal with the blocks... )
yah well 2.0.16 has isues,
well so does the rest, but if you expect use to use it, you should to. " teach what you preach"
as stated in a earlier post ( same topic )
make some sub domain, label them, use one XOOPS or multi...
and link the db with a bridge..
these are a few that came to mine.
Quote:
These shouldnt have to be changed from the original plains...
khuhner wrote:
So Northern, what ideas, thoughts, suggestions do you have to move this forward?
Personaly, and from what ive seen, my oppinion and may other's oppinions arent worth the broadwidth we use..
but i will always be here, and so i will reply. lol
Quote:
khuhner wrote:
Mission Statement
• Foster a centralized unified community for end users, developers (core, module, theme, etc.), and documentation specialists
• Certify modules as “Xoops Ready” (need to establish consensus on what this entails) to ensure successful implementation
• Distribute XOOPS as a package of XOOPS core, modules, themes that are maintained by XOOPS on Xoops.org.
• Generate revenue streams for development, enhancements, and upgrades.
• Create and maintain new product offerings that are easily deployed and flexible by the entire XOOPS user base.
Respectfully submitted,
Kurt
• As for modules, they need to have somthing on them and place in a spot that states they are for version 1 or 2
if they are php4 or php5, sql4 sql5 ready, same with the core files. as for the cerrent modules, almost half the modules we have dont work any more due to version change or not php5 ready. for this we need some one that is good in code, and XOOPS core files, and fix the modules, sence thats is one of the larges complaints....
•• As for offical modules and modules added to the "Out of the box" xoops, this was done in the pre 2.0.11 . Its unsure why they desided to remove them, but they did..
••• Put them back in there, update them, you can still offer the packets of "theme" based modules
Just give a new user somthing to tinker with while they start to understand what they have.
• Theme, if we can get some theme designers to take the cerrent themes we do have, and convert them to 2.0.14+
we will have less of a headack, but as said in the modules section, these to should be placed in a spot that states they are for version 1 or 2.
• Generate revenue
Im sure if just these ( above ) are met, many users will chip in some $ to have themes and modules updated and converted to work on the cerrent, and future version of xoops.
granted many versions and XOOPS based modules are built and made free of charge, and those that arnt have been donated to and charged for.
why cant xoops? chage for the use of the name.. or to be a partner, "offical" does mean alot....
If the core team cam out with a killer looking userpanel as a update im sure no one will mine if that hade to pay for it.... say 20 bux....
• The cerrent XOOPS •
now thats a isue in its self....
most of use ( if you have been here around 2005-2006 ) or have asked about the avatars....found out that XOOPS has a bad db..
Well fix it. dont sit on it.
so what, the xoops_config is all messed up..
make a new "updated" XOOPS site on server of off, subdomain or what ever...
tranfer files images,modules,uploads, and any other "needed items", for the data base... tranfer everything but the 3 config files... youll have to set up the site like a new site, but all users are there, messages,folders, files you just have to place the block in the right places and deal with the meta, name,and slogan related things...
( Im cerrently doing this with HelpXoops.info )
its about 85-90% done, i just need to deal with the blocks... )
yah well 2.0.16 has isues,
well so does the rest, but if you expect use to use it, you should to. " teach what you preach"
as stated in a earlier post ( same topic )
make some sub domain, label them, use one XOOPS or multi...
and link the db with a bridge..
these are a few that came to mine.
Quote:
kc0maz wrote:
What is your vision of the XOOPS product?
What is your vision of the XOOPS project?
These shouldnt have to be changed from the original plains...
Login
Search
Recent Posts
Who's Online
Donat-O-Meter
| Stats | |
| Goal: | $100.00 |
| Due Date: | May 31 |
| Gross Amount: | $0.00 |
| Net Balance: | $0.00 |
| Left to go: | $100.00 |
 |
|