52
Bare in mind that the XOOPS version on cmsmatrix is 2.06, so it's quite out of date.
http://www.opensourcecms.com is also a good site, and you can try out all the major cms's without installing them.
I think the major ones, as mentioned above are all quite similar, and it really boils down to what you are most comfortable administrating. Best to try them out and see how they feel to you.
http://www.opensourcecms.com is also a good site, and you can try out all the major cms's without installing them.
I think the major ones, as mentioned above are all quite similar, and it really boils down to what you are most comfortable administrating. Best to try them out and see how they feel to you.
54
I find it's best to go with a disto that sets it up for you 
I use Fedora as a test server at home, you can set it up as a webserver without any further setup as far as I can remember. If not it's very simple to run 'yum install.....'
I use Fedora as a test server at home, you can set it up as a webserver without any further setup as far as I can remember. If not it's very simple to run 'yum install.....'
58
This is what you will need to do:
XOOPS 2.0.6 to 2.0.7 patch
XOOPS 2.0.7.x to 2.0.9.2 patch
XOOPS 2.0.9.2 to 2.0.10 patch
XOOPS 2.0.10 to 2.0.12a Patch
XOOPS 2.0.12a to 2.0.13 Patch
XOOPS 2.0.13 to 2.0.13.1 Patch (this one might not be necessary, anyone confirm?)
XOOPS 2.0.13.1 to 2.0.13.2 upgrade
Seems you got a bit behind there
XOOPS 2.0.6 to 2.0.7 patch
XOOPS 2.0.7.x to 2.0.9.2 patch
XOOPS 2.0.9.2 to 2.0.10 patch
XOOPS 2.0.10 to 2.0.12a Patch
XOOPS 2.0.12a to 2.0.13 Patch
XOOPS 2.0.13 to 2.0.13.1 Patch (this one might not be necessary, anyone confirm?)
XOOPS 2.0.13.1 to 2.0.13.2 upgrade
Seems you got a bit behind there
60
Quote:
I no developer, just an idea floater
But I do think this would be a good way to bring the community more into the direction and development of the project.
It would ease developers, as they wouldn't have to worry about prioritising feature requests, and it would also encourage people to help out there fellow xoopsers on the forums.
All good IMO
But who is going to write the hack to manage this in the membership module?
I no developer, just an idea floater
But I do think this would be a good way to bring the community more into the direction and development of the project.
It would ease developers, as they wouldn't have to worry about prioritising feature requests, and it would also encourage people to help out there fellow xoopsers on the forums.
All good IMO
Login
Search
Recent Posts
Who's Online
Donat-O-Meter
| Stats | |
| Goal: | $100.00 |
| Due Date: | Apr 30 |
| Gross Amount: | $0.00 |
| Net Balance: | $0.00 |
| Left to go: | $100.00 |
 |
|