30
Quote:
amayer wrote:
Thanks for the info on Plone. Groups *do* matter to me. Is that really true about lack of groups in Plone? That amazes me!
Andy
Well, that's not accurate anymore. As of Plone 2.0, which was released last spring, Plone has very good support for groups of users. The "roles" that another poster described as groups (Manager,Owner,Reviewer,etc) are not intended to be anything like a group.
I use Plone at work for a company intranet and XOOPS for personal hacking to make community oriented sites. I am more "capable" with Xoops, but have done some fairly serious hacking in Plone, including authoring some howto's on plone.org. I consider the 2 to be completely different in focus and capability. I could never get XOOPS to work as smoothly as Plone for our company intranet. For one thing, the groups capability is so good it ties into our Active Directory group structure and I can grant role-based access to folders for groups that our NT admins maintain. That's extra work I don't have to do, just hook it up and forget it.
OTOH, XOOPS is so much easier to work with if you want to really customize things and don't mind coding (which I enjoy). I have written several XOOPS modules and plan to write more. I have no desire to write a Plone "product", it's just too complex. Stuff breaks that I have no idea how to fix. With Plone, I must depend much more on the kindness of the Python/zope wizards, with XOOPS I can figure it out myself.
Dennis