XOOPS 
Forum
Forum Index General Forums Community Support Modules Support Themes Support Development International Support Module Hack Reviews Theme Designer Talk


« 1 ... 29339 29340 29341 (29342) 29343 29344 29345 ... 29425 »


293411
Niels
Re: remembering logins?

  • 2003/2/25 15:41

  • Niels

  • Just popping in

  • Posts: 20

  • Since: 2002/4/19


Hai Devs,

I like this issue also insite my XOOPS build in.
Whe you say this is becose of security reasons, i can understand, but wich one?

I'm not so known of this so please can you explane this a litly more.

Maby we can incrept the password nobody als can use it.

Thanks
Niels

I'm sorry when not al is written correct, my anglisch is very bad.
Topic | Forum


293412
Ace_Armstrong
Re: remembering logins?

Quote:

ryana wrote:
I would like to see a "never log me out" checkbox added to the login block as well.

I agree. I've run into the same problem as some other folks in that people don't want to go to the trouble to log in. It seems like such a simple thing, but people really are that lazy. They'll read a post, but as soon as they realize they need to log in to reply, they make a cost-benefit analysis in their heads and say, "Maybe later." But, of course, when later comes around they forget about it.

Plus, some of the modules (such as the weather blocks) have significantly reduced value if the user can't just glance at the block upon going to the site without logging in first.

Topic | Forum


293413
AndyB
Re: remembering logins?

  • 2003/2/25 14:24

  • AndyB

  • Just popping in

  • Posts: 13

  • Since: 2003/2/19


Quote:

regen_r8 wrote:
Actually, it is just extra sessions in the database that stick around, and how long before the session cookie on your client expires. Only dangerousif you have hundreds of users, but much less annoying than having my session time out because I got a phone call interrupting a post.


I don't get it - why this should be dangerous? Somehow /. manages thousands of users and you have to login only once on a new browser installation, which is perfectly reasonable.

Andy
Topic | Forum


293414
AndyB
Re: remembering logins?

  • 2003/2/25 14:22

  • AndyB

  • Just popping in

  • Posts: 13

  • Since: 2003/2/19


Quote:

RedEye wrote:

but we need to remember there are some servers and countries where the use of cookies isn't welcome...


So what? Even if such places do exist people there would not switch this option while installing the software.

Andy
Topic | Forum


293415
w4z004
Re: Additional user fields

  • 2003/2/25 4:54

  • w4z004

  • XOOPS Advisor

  • Posts: 340

  • Since: 2001/12/13


exact, only touching the core files can obtain this for now..

If you read the roadmap, into our plans we have the dynamic fields creation.

But now we not have this feature.
Topic | Forum


293416
maseal_s
Re: Additional user fields

  • 2003/2/25 3:56

  • maseal_s

  • Just popping in

  • Posts: 3

  • Since: 2003/2/11


The only answer i've find is to hack core files.
It is not a solution
Topic | Forum


293417
Neon
Re: Friendfinder 3.1 problem

  • 2003/2/24 22:22

  • Neon

  • Not too shy to talk

  • Posts: 138

  • Since: 2002/2/8 6


Sounds like you have not chmod'ed 777 the cache directory and 666 the file within. This would cause the setting NOT to be saved.
Topic | Forum


293418
chosen
Friendfinder 3.1 problem

  • 2003/2/24 22:15

  • chosen

  • Just popping in

  • Posts: 29

  • Since: 2002/2/3 1


I installed friendfinder 3.1 with XOOPS 2.0 on my test server and it was insatlled successfully. But when I try to create a profile andsubmit it, I am redirected to the profile creating page again, with an empty form and no profile is created.
I then, tried to change the settings of the module and change the auto-activation to manual activation, but when I do this and press "save", all the settings I change turn back to default settings, no change is saved. I also can't change the "sample state", etc.
I simply can't get it to work, what is the problem with it?Anybody running it normally?
Topic | Forum


293419
Neon
Re: WF-Section V1 just about completed!

  • 2003/2/24 21:05

  • Neon

  • Not too shy to talk

  • Posts: 138

  • Since: 2002/2/8 6


This latest version would be the gem in the crown of sections modules as I have noticed.
Quote:

Ok, am I wasting my time with this version of WF-Section and should I just move straight to a XOOPS V2?

Not at all! I like many others, will not be jumping on the smarty bandwagon straight away, in fact I am setting up another site using 1.3.8 because I know this beast and I know it is stable/reliable. Until I come out the other side of the learning curve of Xoops2 I dont intent putting it in production.

Quote:

I think you should finish the final version for the 1.3x series XOOPS as you planned, like someone else said it may be a while until people actually upgrade and use XOOPS 2 (when it is officialy released) on production sites.


as you can see Im not the only one that thinks this module is worth continuing for 1.3.x

Look forward to the upgrade, as usual you are doing a great job.
Topic | Forum


293420
tzvook
Re: WF-Section V1 just about completed!

  • 2003/2/24 20:45

  • tzvook

  • Just can't stay away

  • Posts: 875

  • Since: 2003/2/1 2


Yep - I'm gonna go with 1.38 too and you wfs is the best thing in it - so upgrading to ver.1 will be great

your work here is great!!!
Topic | Forum






[Advanced Search]

Login

Register now!  |  Lost Password?

Search

Advanced Search

Recent Posts

Who's Online

822 user(s) are online (577 user(s) are browsing Support Forums)

Members: 0

Guests: 822

more...

Donat-O-Meter

Stats
Goal: $100.00
Due Date: Jul 31
Gross Amount: $0.00
Net Balance: $0.00
Left to go: $100.00
Make donations with PayPal!

Latest GitHub Commits