XOOPS 
Forum
Forum Index General Forums Community Support Modules Support Themes Support Development International Support Module Hack Reviews Theme Designer Talk


« 1 ... 4 5 6 (7) 8 9 10 ... 13 »


61
gstarrett
Re: XoopsGallery and WaterMakring Revisited

  • 2003/10/23 6:08

  • gstarrett

  • Friend of XOOPS

  • Posts: 174

  • Since: 2002/3/12


Quote:
gniknalu wrote:
German?

I'd say #1 "A permenant mark on [some|all] uploaded pictures to the gallery? Full size / resize / thumbs?"

Just like the examples on this site.

Thanks,

Gnik


Luxus is German, and the site he referenced was in German (http://service.bama-webdesign.de/modules/mydownloads/), and there were others he's pointed me to before that. He was also one of the more vocal testers on this XoopsGallery update, and a great guy.

Like you said... back to the topic at hand. I took a look at the mod and found a couple of things: It looks like something I can put into XoopsGallery. It's not a permenant mark--it adds it as the pic is being pulled from the server, so it is trivial to work around. It's also using gd2 which I know little about (and why use that instead of NetPBM or ImageMagick that is already required by XoopsGallery--not that I know much about them either).

It is an interesting idea, but I'm not sure that the patch in it's current form would do what you really need. It might be better off hooked through the preprocess routine when an image is added to the gallery--then it would be permenant (and won't require being run every time the image is called, so it's better for busier sites). I'm going to stop short of saying anything definate, but I'll take a look.
Topic | Forum


62
gstarrett
Re: XoopsGallery and WaterMakring Revisited

  • 2003/10/23 3:21

  • gstarrett

  • Friend of XOOPS

  • Posts: 174

  • Since: 2002/3/12


You keep sending me to German sites... so I added a bookmark to bablefish on my hotlist so I don't have to keep typing it in

Lemme see if I understand what the request is here, because there's a few options out there with the different patches available. Did you want:

1) A permenant mark on [some|all] uploaded pictures to the gallery? Full size / resize / thumbs?

2) A mark that only appears when linked from another site? (That's a .htaccess hook, which doesn't have anything to do with Gallery per-se).

3) Some sort of invisible mark (I had a hard time understanding the bablefish translater--tech talk is hard to translate like that I guess).

I could see adding on #2 onto the XoopsGallery if I can get the patch working, and add it as an option on a per-album basis perhaps.
Topic | Forum


63
gstarrett
Re: Xhtml compliance

  • 2003/10/22 17:05

  • gstarrett

  • Friend of XOOPS

  • Posts: 174

  • Since: 2002/3/12


I believe it is (I certainly hope so!!). You can easily check to see if that change fixes it by saving off a copy of the page locally, making the change, then submitting that to the w3c. Opera makes this trivial, just press CTRL-ALT-V and it will submit the current page to the w3c via the upload mechanism so you don't even need to post it publicly to validate it.

Oh, btw: You're correct that all &'s in XHTML are escapes and need a sequence after it... & translates to a proper ampersand.
Topic | Forum


64
gstarrett
Re: XoopsGallery Fixes.. Recent Comments Link, New Pics Block showing thumbnail, etc...

  • 2003/10/22 4:39

  • gstarrett

  • Friend of XOOPS

  • Posts: 174

  • Since: 2002/3/12


Quote:
gruessle wrote:
Since I did the upgrade my random picture block does not work anymore. New pictures block does work only the random pictures does not.
Any ideas?


You'll have that problem if you didn't update your module. The templates have changed significantly since the previous release, so the older templates are not compatible. The newer templates are much more granular, so webmasters can do more to customize them.

If that doesn't fix it, then go to the XoopsGallery site--there's a forum for bugs and the Bug Tracker module where you can report it if it persists.
Topic | Forum


65
gstarrett
Re: XoopsGallery Fixes.. Recent Comments Link, New Pics Block showing thumbnail, etc...

  • 2003/10/21 14:19

  • gstarrett

  • Friend of XOOPS

  • Posts: 174

  • Since: 2002/3/12


Quote:

Dr3vil wrote:
gstarrett worked very hard putting this upgraded together and I would like to thank him for his efforts. The XOOPS community benefits from the efforts of people like him. Thanks Glen!

Dr3vil

ps. This cold one is for you. Cheers!

You're very welcome. XOOPS is a fantastic system, it was the least I could do to offer something in return. And thank you for stepping up to test it and help make it all that it is now!

Hint: Read the full text of the announcement (the announcement on thehttp://www.sciox.org/xoops/ site is the same as what should be posted here).

I think I'll take you up on that cold one :) mmmmmmmm.
Topic | Forum


66
gstarrett
Re: Need testers for XoopsGallery maintenance update

  • 2003/10/21 14:13

  • gstarrett

  • Friend of XOOPS

  • Posts: 174

  • Since: 2002/3/12


Just to follow up on this, the update discussed at the start of this thread has been completed and posted tohttp://www.sciox.org/xoops/ (full details there).

Enjoy!
Topic | Forum


67
gstarrett
Re: XoopsGallery Fixes.. Recent Comments Link, New Pics Block showing thumbnail, etc...

  • 2003/10/21 5:10

  • gstarrett

  • Friend of XOOPS

  • Posts: 174

  • Since: 2002/3/12


FYI, the XoopsGallery update is done and available athttp://www.sciox.org/xoops/

I have an announcement that is awaiting moderator approval here. The details are available on the site linked above.
Topic | Forum


68
gstarrett
Re: SOLVED: Re: Strange xoopsgallery problem

  • 2003/10/21 2:47

  • gstarrett

  • Friend of XOOPS

  • Posts: 174

  • Since: 2002/3/12


The reason that happened is the statistics module has a commonly used variable that collides with one used by XoopsGallery.

You might try patching the included file by wrapping it with something like this:
function AccumulateStatistics() {
    [original include file here]
}
AccumulateStatistics();

That would change the scope of the variables used in the include file to not collide with page-level variables XoopsGallery or any other module uses.

Let me know if it works. I checked out the module breifly because coreace was trying to use the same thing. Another thing I noticed with that module is that it looks like it won't record any statistics on pages that aren't resulting from a POST query.

[edit] I had this backwards, posting to the database is correct in that include file.

If you could, please confirm both that the suggested patch helps and the statistics do only seem to update on post queries and I'll send the suggestions on to the module author.

P.S. The update Luxus mentioed that I am developing is complete--you can get it athttp://www.sciox.org/xoops/, the announcement should be posted here shortly.
Topic | Forum


69
gstarrett
Re: XoopsGallery and WaterMakring Revisited

  • 2003/10/20 23:39

  • gstarrett

  • Friend of XOOPS

  • Posts: 174

  • Since: 2002/3/12


Version 1.3.3.2 is now available. I just posted the announcement and update to the download link, awaiting approval. You can get it at the link Luxus posted.

It's done! Yay!
Topic | Forum


70
gstarrett
Re: XoopsGallery and WaterMakring Revisited

  • 2003/10/20 0:07

  • gstarrett

  • Friend of XOOPS

  • Posts: 174

  • Since: 2002/3/12


I'll have to take a closer look later, but it's an interesting mod. Anyone else interested in getting this to work? Anyone else currently have it working who might want to post a patch?
Topic | Forum



TopTop
« 1 ... 4 5 6 (7) 8 9 10 ... 13 »



[Advanced Search]

Login

Register now!  |  Lost Password?

Search

Advanced Search

Recent Posts

Who's Online

68 user(s) are online (40 user(s) are browsing Support Forums)

Members: 0

Guests: 68

more...

Donat-O-Meter

Stats
Goal: $100.00
Due Date: May 31
Gross Amount: $0.00
Net Balance: $0.00
Left to go: $100.00
Make donations with PayPal!

Latest GitHub Commits