Quote:
The Modules Chronolabs (wishcraft) have developed for XOOPS 2.5 (Not Limited To) Include:
Simon, this should be:
Quote:
The Modules Chronolabs (wishcraft) have developed or contributed to, for XOOPS 2.5 (Not Limited To) Include:
Because these module below have not been developed by you, they were already in existence before:
-X-Forum (Forum for XOOPS 2.6 with antispam.)
-MyAlbum-p (Image Galleries.)
-Profile (Profile module for advanced user management.)
-xHelp (Help/Support/Sales Ticketing Module.)
-XoopsPolls (Xoops Polling module used in conjunction with X-Forum.)
-XQuiz (Questing and Quizzing module.)
-ZenTrack (Help/Support/Sales ticketing module.)
-X-News (News Module.)
-SmartFAQ (FAQ for XOOPS.)
-AdsLight (Advertising Module.)
You have developed a lot of original modules, so there is really no need to claim other people's module as yours!
As an Open Source project, since people don't get paid, the most important thing is to give credit to people who have developed the module originally. That's the least what we can do for them! And GPL is very clear about it too!
Anyway, good to see you back!
One recommendation that I would have for you, is to brand all your original modules with a prefix similar to what others did in the past, like the "WF-modules" or "SmartModules". You could use something like "chrono", so we would have "chronoNews," "chronoForums", etc. Just make sure that each module is clonable, so people could use them as "chronoForums", but could also clone them to "myForums" or "forums". But this will be also a good PR for your company, since everybody will know that chronoModules are coming from ChronoLabs! It's a good branding for you.