21
ghia
Re: Slim or fat - Where is competition going?
  • 2009/4/21 20:31

  • ghia

  • Community Support Member

  • Posts: 4953

  • Since: 2008/7/3 1


Step 1: W3C validation is always a goal to strive to and XOOPS could better in this respect.
Step 2: is easy for small sites, but how do you get 10000 pages in that?
I find SEO is also more hype, then it is worth. Google and co have been adapted to cope with the 'standard' CMS URL's.

22
MrGrey
Re: Slim or fat - Where is competition going?
  • 2009/4/22 11:55

  • MrGrey

  • Just popping in

  • Posts: 62

  • Since: 2008/4/13


Quote:

MrGrey wrote:

Have you seen a3webtech


First they make an interesting grouping of CMS after features:http://www.a3webtech.com/index.php/cms-2.html

Second interesting is a list over Bad CMS faults:http://www.a3webtech.com/index.php/cms-2a.html

I believe this site make sense, perhaps not inventing anything new but trying to make some distinctions and pinpoint things that are valuable to recognise. Although not new it probably still is interetsing for both newbies and developers. Newbies for its descriptions and developers for structuring "CMS market" and critics.



In the a3tech page they somewhere write something like: " - When ever has a geek cared about image?"


Know your hood

In a new world of existing ~2000 CMS its nice to know the waters you are sailing.

So if we turn this thread back a little into that overview (also closer to tread topic). Whats is XOOPS about and how does it compare to other CMS, not to "rank" more like looking at position and strong sides?


Login

Who's Online

175 user(s) are online (108 user(s) are browsing Support Forums)


Members: 0


Guests: 175


more...

Donat-O-Meter

Stats
Goal: $100.00
Due Date: Apr 30
Gross Amount: $0.00
Net Balance: $0.00
Left to go: $100.00
Make donations with PayPal!

Latest GitHub Commits