89
Quote:
Rhomal wrote:
Quote:
xafadb wrote:
However when it comes to a module or what ever that has solely business/commerce applications I do not think it is wrong to ask for donations to defray development costs.
Neither do I
However, the model AMS used, and apparently the same model this module will use is NOT based on a 'donation' its based on a -fee-. There is a significant difference which is my point of contention.
Withholding a module until you give money is NOT a donation its a purchase/fee. So lets call it with it is and stop candy coating it by calling it something that it is not.
The shareware/freeware model is donation based. This is not.
According to the GNU
Selling Free Software page he could actually charge whatever he wants to recoup his expenditures, the only restriction being that he cannot infringe on others rights to distribute it free.
The way I look at it is this is a community of individuals that use XOOPS and want great modules every day. Free software is not a handout, it is a mechanism to share with everyone, programs, cost, and support. If someone is developing a module that would be of use to you, it would only be right, if help was requested to lend a hand or some money to get the job done. The cost will spread out over time and lots more new modules would be available. Sit back and wait for something perfect for your application, and do nothing, you may be waiting a long time.
In essence, yes, you are never required to donate. But, if someone developing does not ask, he may not let other users that would like to share in his expense do so. So
do not belittle someone for asking. If you do not want to contribute just stay out of the discussion, lay in the shadows, and pounce on the program after it is free and available.
Just my 2 cents