8
Quote:
carnuke wrote:
Council,
Did you say WHY?... I don't think so. All I can say is every CMS has its strong and weak points, so switching may simply be a choice of needing a different set of features not offered by Xoops, and that's just fine. (as Mith suggested) However, if there are obvious problems/ lack of features/ whatever with Xoops, we want to hear about them, in a positive constructive way. That way, we all benefit and you get your 'dream' CMS
want to play ??? 
I was reading something the inventor of Php Nuke said about Xoops. He said Xoops's object-oriented format is good for very large sites but not good for small ones. His logic seem to make sense, so I installed PHP-Nuke and played around with it.
At first, it seemed very fast and the default themes seemed a lot more polished than Xoops'. Then I began noticing little things -- the way the text in all the modules is inferior, no wysiwyg editor, less overall blocks flexability.
Also, the support forum is dead. Posts hang in there for weeks without answers. Finally, I couldn't find anything on the site: modules, themes, showcase sites, nothing was where I expected it to be.
I concluded that PHP-Nuke -- although an obviously outstanding application -- had turned into a Frankenstein -- had became too massive to control.
Ric
