Hi All,

I've just finished doing an in depth performance & scalability analysis of AMS, Articles 0.17, News 1.2.1 and WF-Sections 2.07 Beta for any that are interested in seeing. I'll post a News item as well, but for now you can see the article here.

What is the motivation of the analysis?
What is the criterion/a choosing samples?


This recalls me another story that I have reported to XOOPS Official Managers but still no response after a so long time.
On the homepage of a XOOPS Official Local Support Site, the webmaster puts a keynote news item:
Quote:

Once NewBB 2.0 Final released, I am going to working on WFsection 2.07 and hope the 2.07 Final can be released by end of this year.

The motivation is explained in the article, but in a nutshell it was due to there being no information of this type available for users (at least non that I know of or could find anywhere). Not sure what you're asking in the second question . What do you mean by samples? The test script entered the exact same content into every article in every module if that is what your asking ?

I'm not sure how this reminds you of a local XOOPS support site that is trying to coax people into visiting a drupal site, as all the modules in my analysis are XOOPS based. Although I do agree that a local XOOPS support site saying they have no time for XOOPS AND trying to get them to visit their new drupal site is a problem.

There is no lying down with you is there phppp . NewBB 2 and WF-Section finals by the end of the year is going to make you a very busy man . I look forward to seeing them both, and will update the WF-Section final data in my article when the final is released.