Catzwolf,
And why would you be furious about it?
1) the ranking (which should be more properly called "status") is to reflect everybody's
current main area of contributions. If your main contributions are themes, you're a "Theme Designer", if you're contributing mainly to Modules, you're a "Module Designer", and if you're moderating, you're a "Moderator". So people know how you contribute to XOOPS. Pretty simple and logical, right?
2) The ranking/role designation is
not for life. People's roles and contributions change and the status changes to reflect it.
3) The ranking is NOT a real "ranking". The name is not correct, because people seem to think that if they are not "XOOPS Developers" anymore, they've been "demoted" and it's end of the world! This is NOT the case. It's only reflection of your currently
main area of contribution to XOOPS!
Just please look at you contributions in the last 12 months and tell us was is your "main area" of contributions?
For both of you - Simon and you, it's modules. You yourself stated in
your announcement that you will be working on your modules! So it's only logical that you're listed as "Module Developer", isn't it?
Trabis is the best example how it should be done - after he read Simon's complaint, he contacted me and asked me to change his status from "XOOPS Developer" to "Module Developer". The reason? He is done with 2.4.5 development and wants to focus again on modules, and therefore it was only logical for him that his "status/ranking" would reflect that.
But it seems like for you and Simon being a "Module Developer" is something beneath your status and only "XOOPS Developer" is the ranking that you could accept.
You know what? If this is what you want, just let me know and I reinstate you and Simon as "XOOPS Developer" again.
Anybody else wants to be "XOOPS Developer" too? It really doesn't matter what you're working on currently. You want to be "XOOPS Developer" - no problem! You got it!