xoops forums

Forum Index


Board index » All Posts (poehoes)




poehoes

Friend of XOOPS
Posted on: 2013/5/29 22:47
poehoes
poehoes (Show more)
Friend of XOOPS
Posts: 24
Since: 2003/3/27
#1

Re: XOOPS 2.5.6 Final Release Issues

The part about "Upgrading from previous versions older than 2.5.5 (Full Update)" but also the documentation inside the "xoops-2.5.6_full_upgrade.zip"-package in the "release_notes.txt" (paragraph "Upgrading from versions older than 2.5.0:") states:
File Normal For upgrade
mainfile.php 400 700
/include/license.php 444 777

but i think that should be:
File Normal For upgrade
mainfile.php 444 777
/include/license.php 444 777

because my site stopped working

But on the good side: upgraded from 2.4.5 to 2.5.6 with no problems with the instructions from forementioned paragraph, thanx! Very good!


poehoes

Friend of XOOPS
Posted on: 2011/9/14 14:18
poehoes
poehoes (Show more)
Friend of XOOPS
Posts: 24
Since: 2003/3/27
#2

Re: templates manager

@mboyden: you can see in the listed paths in my previous message that i'm already using those paths.

@sabahan: i'm aware of theme overriding. That is the same thing the templates manager is for. The templates manager generates specific templates (you choose in the templatesmanager) and generates the files you need in the selected theme. After generation you can edit the template online (which is a great enhancement of Xoops2.5, I think).

But what permissions does the webserver need to generate, well actually save, those files on the server. Because if that is 777 than anyone can save new templates including possible some mailicous injections in those template-files.

PS @ForMusS: Thanx, if you want more info, i'm still testing


poehoes

Friend of XOOPS
Posted on: 2011/9/12 14:16
poehoes
poehoes (Show more)
Friend of XOOPS
Posts: 24
Since: 2003/3/27
#3

templates manager

I really love the new Xoops version! Especially the new admin-interface give Xoops the professional look of a serious cms.

I'm trying to use the Templates manager in xoops 2.5.1a (with PHP 5.2.17) to make custom templates for another theme i created. But i can't generate the templates for this theme. It seems it has to do with permissions on the filesystem or so.

What i found out so far:
- all files/directories are owned by me
- if i choose my theme / forced file generation - yes / all modules (only system and fmcontent) i get the message 'no files generated'
-> this is good because file permissions are not set to allow this.

adjustment 1:
- i chmod the directory /themes/mytheme/modules to 757 (apache should be able to write here now)
- if i choose mytheme / forced file generation - yes / Select modules (only fmcontent), i select all shown files, the template-files for fmcontent are generated (owned by apache)
- the templatesmanager shows these files and the subdirectory blocks but inside blocks no files are generated.

adjustment 2:
- i chown the directory /themes/mytheme/modules/fmcontent/blocks to myself and set permission on this directory to 757 again
- after choosing mytheme / forced file generation - yes / Select modules (only fmcontent), i select all shown files, all block-files for fmcontent are generated (owned by apache)
- the templatesmanager shows these files now.

* Is this normal for the Xoops Templatesmanager?
* How should i apply permissions to the files? The template files are now world-writeable, but if i chown them to myself i can't edit the files!

Any comments?


poehoes

Friend of XOOPS
Posted on: 2011/9/9 22:34
poehoes
poehoes (Show more)
Friend of XOOPS
Posts: 24
Since: 2003/3/27
#4

Re: Fmcontent new version : Test and report bugs

Eventually found this while i had actually already abandoned this module: you need an extra Framework: modulesadmin. Can be found here: http://www.freexoopservices.com/modul ... oads/singlefile.php?lid=3

Documentation how to install is included!

Menu works now...

@Voltan: maybe something to put in a readme?


poehoes

Friend of XOOPS
Posted on: 2010/5/31 9:46
poehoes
poehoes (Show more)
Friend of XOOPS
Posts: 24
Since: 2003/3/27
#5

Re: New (unofficial) Dutch translation team

Yeah, i'd like to help!


poehoes

Friend of XOOPS
Posted on: 2009/11/6 13:09
poehoes
poehoes (Show more)
Friend of XOOPS
Posts: 24
Since: 2003/3/27
#6

Re: xlanguage in xoops 2.4

Great! Now i can upgrade without extra steps


In the Trunk there still exists a readme.txt that gives the old instructions (hackin into common.php). Maybe that should be deleted too?


poehoes

Friend of XOOPS
Posted on: 2007/6/13 8:53
poehoes
poehoes (Show more)
Friend of XOOPS
Posts: 24
Since: 2003/3/27
#7

Re: Default Who's Online never shows guests

Gosh,

I don't know which version XOOPS had in 2004, but I applied this same piece of code of link1 again in the current XOOPS version 2.0.16.

Can't this be included in the core -> i think this is a security issue...

But i'm still very fond of XOOPS Using it for several sites now!


poehoes

Friend of XOOPS
Posted on: 2004/5/18 15:34
poehoes
poehoes (Show more)
Friend of XOOPS
Posts: 24
Since: 2003/3/27
#8

Re: Installing Wiki/Wiwi Problem

Hello, i had the same problem. It's really obvious. A wikisite works with CamelCase.

So if you use for instance WikiLink this word is automagically recognized and has a red question mark next to it (and when you click this it will add a new page).

If you use doublebrackets it another way of specifiing a hyperlink but then you have to write/type a 'real' hyperlink. This can be your wikisite but also externally, but then you don't get the ?!

I use wikimod and it has a doc with 'Text Formatting Rules'; you should read it again, and more closely!

Suc6, Robbie


poehoes

Friend of XOOPS
Posted on: 2004/5/14 12:12
poehoes
poehoes (Show more)
Friend of XOOPS
Posts: 24
Since: 2003/3/27
#9

Re: Default Who's Online never shows guests

Thanxxxx,

The first link was precize what i wanted

Grtz Robbie


poehoes

Friend of XOOPS
Posted on: 2004/5/12 14:33
poehoes
poehoes (Show more)
Friend of XOOPS
Posts: 24
Since: 2003/3/27
#10

Re: Default Who's Online never shows guests

Quote:
Members can elect to hide their email address from public display poehoes under their profile. Hope this helps.

This is true (i tested the possibilities), but then members can't find each others' emailaddress any more! And thats very important.

Maybe this is a block that is only useful for members, and i should disable it again for anonymous users, but it would be nice when you're not logged in you can see that there are other members online. And that guests (which for us are potential members) can see that there is more...



TopTop
(1) 2 »