1
hervet
Re: Instant-Zero closes its doors
  • 2009/11/14 9:50

  • hervet

  • Friend of XOOPS

  • Posts: 2267

  • Since: 2003/11/4


All commercial modules are my legal property



2
hervet
Re: License Key Validation
  • 2009/10/24 6:57

  • hervet

  • Friend of XOOPS

  • Posts: 2267

  • Since: 2003/11/4


Quote:

wishcraft wrote:
I am wondering who will offer the first validator for XOOPS, that is something that will validate your got a licenced version of Xoops..

Now it's a licencied product ? Not anymore Open Source ?



3
hervet
Re: License Key Validation - Unique Identifier
  • 2009/10/24 6:56

  • hervet

  • Friend of XOOPS

  • Posts: 2267

  • Since: 2003/11/4


Quote:

wishcraft wrote:
With the advent of PHP5

Five years ago ...



4
hervet
Re: adding jquery in admin <head>
  • 2009/10/22 12:57

  • hervet

  • Friend of XOOPS

  • Posts: 2267

  • Since: 2003/11/4


Simply type :
echo "<script type="text/javascript" src="http://www.example.org/myscript.js"></script>";
It does not change anything to call it from the head or from the "bottom". Yahoo even advice to call JS scripts in the bottom of the pages ...



5
hervet
Re: Oracle and 2.4
  • 2009/10/13 10:00

  • hervet

  • Friend of XOOPS

  • Posts: 2267

  • Since: 2003/11/4





6
hervet
Re: Oracle and 2.4
  • 2009/10/11 7:36

  • hervet

  • Friend of XOOPS

  • Posts: 2267

  • Since: 2003/11/4


PDO with a real good ORM (like Doctrine) is the solution.
No need to reinvent the wheel.



7
hervet
Re: hervé t.
  • 2009/9/11 8:23

  • hervet

  • Friend of XOOPS

  • Posts: 2267

  • Since: 2003/11/4


thank you but why ?



8
hervet
Re: Editors in 2.4.0 beta
  • 2009/8/28 13:38

  • hervet

  • Friend of XOOPS

  • Posts: 2267

  • Since: 2003/11/4


Most of the sites content is maintained by non technician people so they need a WYSIWYG editor with images uploading features.

The question is which one to adopt, may be it's interesting to see what other projects have done (Wordpress for example), what editors projects are alive still a long time and maintained.

Personnaly I vote for Tiny MCE.



9
hervet
Re: Editors in 2.4.0 beta
  • 2009/8/28 13:14

  • hervet

  • Friend of XOOPS

  • Posts: 2267

  • Since: 2003/11/4


I'll change it in the opposite way, XOOPS 2.0.x will be tested and if it's not this version, it will be used in the >= 2.3 way.



10
hervet
Re: Editors in 2.4.0 beta
  • 2009/8/28 12:59

  • hervet

  • Friend of XOOPS

  • Posts: 2267

  • Since: 2003/11/4


Ok sorry, but I persist on 2 points :
1/ It's not a good idea to change the code of running modules for a BETA version
2/ It's time to adopt a definitive editor




TopTop
(1) 2 3 4 ... 139 »



Login

Username:
Password:

Lost Password? Register now!

Who's Online

74 user(s) are online (34 user(s) are browsing Support Forums)


Members: 0


Guests: 74


more...

Donat-O-Meter

Stats
Goal: $100.00
Due Date: May 31
Gross Amount: $0.00
Net Balance: $0.00
Left to go: $100.00
Make donations with PayPal!

Latest GitHub Commits