xoops forums

Forum Index


Board index » All Posts (hervet)




hervet

Friend of XOOPS
Posted on: 2009/11/14 9:50
hervet
hervet (Show more)
Friend of XOOPS
Posts: 2267
Since: 2003/11/4
#1

Re: Instant-Zero closes its doors

All commercial modules are my legal property


hervet

Friend of XOOPS
Posted on: 2009/10/24 6:57
hervet
hervet (Show more)
Friend of XOOPS
Posts: 2267
Since: 2003/11/4
#2

Re: License Key Validation

Quote:

wishcraft wrote:
I am wondering who will offer the first validator for XOOPS, that is something that will validate your got a licenced version of Xoops..

Now it's a licencied product ? Not anymore Open Source ?


hervet

Friend of XOOPS
Posted on: 2009/10/24 6:56
hervet
hervet (Show more)
Friend of XOOPS
Posts: 2267
Since: 2003/11/4
#3

Re: License Key Validation - Unique Identifier

Quote:

wishcraft wrote:
With the advent of PHP5

Five years ago ...


hervet

Friend of XOOPS
Posted on: 2009/10/22 12:57
hervet
hervet (Show more)
Friend of XOOPS
Posts: 2267
Since: 2003/11/4
#4

Re: adding jquery in admin <head>

Simply type :
echo "<script type="text/javascript" src="http://www.example.org/myscript.js"></script>";


It does not change anything to call it from the head or from the "bottom".
Yahoo even advice to call JS scripts in the bottom of the pages ...


hervet

Friend of XOOPS
Posted on: 2009/10/13 10:00
hervet
hervet (Show more)
Friend of XOOPS
Posts: 2267
Since: 2003/11/4
#5

Re: Oracle and 2.4

http://www.doctrine-project.org/


hervet

Friend of XOOPS
Posted on: 2009/10/11 7:36
hervet
hervet (Show more)
Friend of XOOPS
Posts: 2267
Since: 2003/11/4
#6

Re: Oracle and 2.4

PDO with a real good ORM (like Doctrine) is the solution.
No need to reinvent the wheel.


hervet

Friend of XOOPS
Posted on: 2009/9/11 8:23
hervet
hervet (Show more)
Friend of XOOPS
Posts: 2267
Since: 2003/11/4
#7

Re: hervé t.

thank you but why ?


hervet

Friend of XOOPS
Posted on: 2009/8/28 13:38
hervet
hervet (Show more)
Friend of XOOPS
Posts: 2267
Since: 2003/11/4
#8

Re: Editors in 2.4.0 beta

Most of the sites content is maintained by non technician people so they need a WYSIWYG editor with images uploading features.

The question is which one to adopt, may be it's interesting to see what other projects have done (Wordpress for example), what editors projects are alive still a long time and maintained.

Personnaly I vote for Tiny MCE.


hervet

Friend of XOOPS
Posted on: 2009/8/28 13:14
hervet
hervet (Show more)
Friend of XOOPS
Posts: 2267
Since: 2003/11/4
#9

Re: Editors in 2.4.0 beta

I'll change it in the opposite way, XOOPS 2.0.x will be tested and if it's not this version, it will be used in the >= 2.3 way.


hervet

Friend of XOOPS
Posted on: 2009/8/28 12:59
hervet
hervet (Show more)
Friend of XOOPS
Posts: 2267
Since: 2003/11/4
#10

Re: Editors in 2.4.0 beta

Ok sorry, but I persist on 2 points :
1/ It's not a good idea to change the code of running modules for a BETA version
2/ It's time to adopt a definitive editor



TopTop
(1) 2 3 4 ... 139 »