Quote:
tzvook wrote:
A few thoughts/points about it all
- CMS is all about managing content!
- Content is being managed by subject, not by functionality (modules).
...
Try to see at it from other side (not
opposite, but
different)
Each site dedicated to some theme, and if you can't define it, or it's a "mix of unmixamble things" - it's bad planned site. Site "about all near..." is really "site about nothing". In your example I (personally) will hate idea to aggregate into target audience so different categories as your suggested
From my POV - each site have
one topic, categories and modules offer only different view on it and|or some of it's sides... If you want strict topic separation on site - maybe it's time to think about separation site into network of sites?!
Not a best, but still usable example (I think) - my own project E-City (some free services, which I miss as widely offered and create for me and others), oriented to (rather wide) target - old, power, great "grey" netizens - from first minutes of idea was (is and will be) separated to different sites in one net (thanks to subsite module): one service (one type of users) - one site
And I haven't "module problem" this way - each visiter can be interested in all site, which part is more needed can be defined only by user's mind, but user have all in hands - all what hecan want to use-read-improve - and nothing more... useless... what I must separate into separate cross-site topics.
All site offtipics are topics on other net's sites and user know it and can jump, if you he wants
I.e user does not truncate incoming information by default (s you suggested), he can add additional channels, when and if it will be needed.
Fufff, hope I wrote my thinkings in redable and usable form. I not - sorry, "My mothetongue is not English, but C++"