61
toddherrold
Re: what the heck is a trackback in weblog ?

i don't really get what trackbacks are but somehow they are used to map or thread conversations together in the blogosphere, across sites, and time, etc. I don't know many people who use them other than spammers.

not sure how weblog works. I used to use it a long time ago but gave it up for wordpress which had a lot more functionality. wordpress has lots of plugins to fight both comment spam and trackback spam. it also allows you to disable trackbacks, which is what I do.

Some blogs also use a system where you rename the trackback file to something random, which makes it hard for the spam bots to find it. . . usually, it's something like trackback_post.php and spambots look for this type of naming convention, but some blog software enables you to change it to whatever you want like SpammersCan'tFindThisFile.php.

Again, I had to go with XPress because I think it's the most secure against spammers.



62
toddherrold
Re: "no valid security token found in session" when posting comments.

hmmm. i definitely think it's on the right track, but the token error I consistently get happens regardless of the amount of time taking to place the post. It can happen on a 10 minute post or a couple of seconds. . . It's almost like the sessions are irrlevant.



63
toddherrold
Re: xoops 2.2.3 - problems with custom blocks being blank

I am building a new 2.2.3 Final site and was having this precise problem with custom blocks and phpAdsNew. Updating the system module worked for me. If this doesn't work, you could follow the instructions in this FAQ. This should solve the problem:

https://xoops.org/modules/smartfaq/faq.php?faqid=533



64
toddherrold
Re: Mambo - Joomla! Discussion

Oh, I thought I would also add that from my last few days of research and testing, it appears that the only Joomla component that I discovered that is really on par with XOOPS modules, is one created by Predator - a former XOOPS developer. He has ported Wordpress with true integration (not just a bridge) into Joomla. . and it is fantastic. It doesn't have all the functionality that the phpPP Wordpress for Xoops, but it is a beauty to behold.

So, in short. . XOOPS is something special and unique and has tremendous power, flexibility, and relative simplicity. Whateve it's challenges, it's a fantastic system. With some better marketing and community relations, along with continued advanced development, it will most assuredly remain a leading CMS. . .



65
toddherrold
Re: Mambo - Joomla! Discussion

With all of this conversation about XOOPS vs. Joomla/Mambo, I thought I would try Joomla out. I have never really used it. I remember about 2 years ago when i first started creating websites, I tried out a bunch of systems, including xoops, mambo, movable type, php nuke, post nuke, etc. I ended up opting for XOOPS at the time because it seems the most intuitive, easy to use, and stable. i couldn't get alot of the modules and components working very easily with the other systems and had a hard time figuring out the admin interface.

Well, I've been getting a little burned out on XOOPS after upgrading my sites to 2.2.x without really investigating the 2.2 version and not knowing about all the bugs. Things have definitely gotten better in that regard with 2.2.3 Final, but it still needs some work. Anyway, so an opportunity to test a different system came up. . so I installed Joomla! over the last few days and have been building a site.

And the verdict is: Joomla! actually isn't that great, and I would not use it over Xoops. The admin interface is certainly more professional looking than xoops, but the structure is way too complicated. Joomla is also not optimized for community sites that focus on user generated content. The modules and components are not as advanced as those of XOOPS and do not provide the advanced functionality that XOOPS modules do. In fact, in order to get the XOOPS level of functionality in article management, forums, or photo galleries in Joomla, you actually have to use the standalone versions of whatever gallery or forum and then use a "bridge" component or module, to bring that content into the Joomla frame. These bridges are very complicated to install and do not work that well, not too mention the challenge of wrapping or framing a different system. You will notice on most joomla sites that any sophisticated galleries or forums are actually the standalone versions, and often times to go to these from the main joomla site, results in a changing the GUI and layout of the site. This is exceedingly jarring to users and is just plain bad web design. The alternative is to use integrated Joomla components but these generally have far less utility than the XOOPS equivalent. Also, installing certain components and modules in XOOPS often disrupts the proper functioning of other componentes.

Also, in Joomla it is not easy/intuitive to create custom blocks or to copy blocks to make them appear in different areas and positions on your site.

Basically, Joomla would probably be fine for a relatively static site whose content doesn't change that often or a site that doesn't really need to provide advanced user generated content features.

Frankly, IMHO Joomla in know way excels beyond XOOPS in terms of technology and functionality. The only areas that I believe it beats XOOPS in, is the enthusiasm of the developer community at the present time (despite the recent Mambo/Joomla fork) and the quality of the theme design for this system. They've got a huge number of very talented theme makers and thus Joomla sites often "look" more sophisticated than XOOPS sites. But don't let the nice design fool you. . . It's not that great of a system.

So, I am here with Xoops! And, feel much better now that I have tried at least one of the competitors and despite whatever challenges this project continues to have, I'm sticking it out!

Sorry this is so long, I just thought I would provide my experience here. Now I have to run and delete my Joomla site and install XOOPS 2.0.x.



66
toddherrold
Re: upgrade to 2.0.13.2 or 2.2.3???

I'm sorry. People are being very polite here.

Stick with the lower version as 2.2.3 is still very buggy, works with many fewer modules, and there is probably no good reason for you to upgrade to it. Most likely, you will be sorry if you do.



67
toddherrold
Re: Shoutbox 3.1 breaks template in IE but not Firefox

that would be excellent!!!



68
toddherrold
Re: Shoutbox 3.1 breaks template in IE but not Firefox

ok, I see now. thank you! Too different items. Yes, I think I will take your suggestion to remove names from blog comments so that it doesn't wrap.

I can't really do the shoutbox in the center column. What do you think about this:

If I expand the right column to the size of the shoutbox, do you think it will resolve? Or, do you think the shoutbox would just break it again and become bigger?



69
toddherrold
Re: Shoutbox 3.1 breaks template in IE but not Firefox

Thanks Giga. . I speak Spanish, but not Portuguese, so I got about 90% of your note here. Also, you posted something on my shoutbox about "in block recent blog comments, look template for name. Use title a pronto.. . " not sure what that meant.

So the problem is with "same subject?" and it's trying to place in the center column rather than right?



70
toddherrold
Re: Did I upgraded my Xoops?

then, yes. it sounds like you upgraded. I am running version 2.2.3 Final and my system module is 2.13, so I think that is ok.

But this is a very good question and has come up A LOT. Why doesn't XOOPS have a place in the admin where IT TELLS YOU what version you are running.




TopTop
« 1 ... 4 5 6 (7) 8 9 10 ... 23 »



Login

Who's Online

214 user(s) are online (165 user(s) are browsing Support Forums)


Members: 0


Guests: 214


more...

Donat-O-Meter

Stats
Goal: $100.00
Due Date: Apr 30
Gross Amount: $0.00
Net Balance: $0.00
Left to go: $100.00
Make donations with PayPal!

Latest GitHub Commits