41
gtop00
Re: Show us the $$$....!
  • 2007/12/13 18:48

  • gtop00

  • Friend of XOOPS

  • Posts: 498

  • Since: 2004/11/13


Quote:

mauricio wrote:
+1 BAN THEM ALL FROM THE XOOPS PROJECT!!!!!!!!!

Why my friend? Is it an open source project? Aren't you registered in another open source project?

Please stop this now!



42
gtop00
Re:
  • 2007/11/15 16:24

  • gtop00

  • Friend of XOOPS

  • Posts: 498

  • Since: 2004/11/13


Well Dimitris, there are some places around where somebody can contribute.

For anything in Greek, you are more than welcome to the Greek XOOPS Community. You can post at "Tutorials".

If you have something in English that you wish to share, you can use the FAQ here for something short, or the XOOPS wiki as well as the XOOPS docs.

Keep Xoopsing



43
gtop00
Re:
  • 2007/11/15 11:18

  • gtop00

  • Friend of XOOPS

  • Posts: 498

  • Since: 2004/11/13


Well, considering that "psaxtiri" in Greek means "seeker" in English, I would say that I am a better "psaxtiri".

Have a look at at this thread here.

And, by the way, "there is no documentation explaining those details ha". Can you help in creating one?
This is Open Source.



44
gtop00
Re: something dodgy goin on. hack attempt or genuine??
  • 2007/11/12 21:15

  • gtop00

  • Friend of XOOPS

  • Posts: 498

  • Since: 2004/11/13


Quote:

JAVesey wrote:
The sort-order on my Inbox changed

Mine too.



45
gtop00
Re: Japanese Site
  • 2007/11/10 14:15

  • gtop00

  • Friend of XOOPS

  • Posts: 498

  • Since: 2004/11/13


Quote:

What is the subject of the topic ?


It was about the ability of XOOPS to support multilanguage sites like Japanese/English, which is possible.

The question asked by a new member having 1 post. Can we advice him how?

All the rest you wrote here are meaningless.



46
gtop00
Re: Proposal: Towards A Sustainable Open Source Project
  • 2007/10/29 15:36

  • gtop00

  • Friend of XOOPS

  • Posts: 498

  • Since: 2004/11/13


Hi Darcy and Crip,

Do you agree to remove the "Appendix A" (Code of Conduct) from the Proposals discussions?
I believe that a) we all agree on the 'Code of Conduct', b) in case of any discussion, it should be separated from the proposals.



47
gtop00
Re: Proposal: Towards A Sustainable Open Source Project
  • 2007/10/29 10:09

  • gtop00

  • Friend of XOOPS

  • Posts: 498

  • Since: 2004/11/13


Quote:
SailJapan and I worked on it last night to bring together what was discussed in the forum. There was so much extra "chatter" not relating to the report Crip and MadFish are looking to evaluate. He was learning how to use the wiki and we are trying to determine the worth of the wiki in providing a place where all can input.

This stands for all of us too (I am also new to wiki which BTW is a perfect tool for co-elaboration).
I think that it is the time to decide how we are going to proceed. Do not forget that from now on, all members should be informed equally in order to avoid any misunderstandings...



48
gtop00
Re: Proposal: Towards A Sustainable Open Source Project
  • 2007/10/28 23:43

  • gtop00

  • Friend of XOOPS

  • Posts: 498

  • Since: 2004/11/13


Quote:

BlueStocking wrote:
Dear gtop00,

Are you satisified with the way we are presenting your charts?

Your input is greatly appreciated.

Thank you,
...darcy

See proposal and add to subtract from and correct where you see necessary. please...


Hi Darcy,

I am impressed from the work you have done at the wiki!

1 complaint only; I was not informed about...

Regarding the presentation of the charts, I certainly have no problem. Most important is if those who made the proposals are happy with the diagrams. If not, I am waiting for their corrections.
Also, all proposals text should be formated in a similar way. I can do that for mine.



49
gtop00
Re: Proposal: Towards A Sustainable Open Source Project
  • 2007/10/28 22:51

  • gtop00

  • Friend of XOOPS

  • Posts: 498

  • Since: 2004/11/13


Damaster wrote:
Quote:

Hi Gtop,

I have proposed to help long time ago and also specify
that one don't need a title or a seat to contribute.
Just Freedom !

But the 'environment' is not favourable
So I share with others that contribute here.

Some people feel good contributing, some sharing
and some others getting ! That's life and Open SOurce

All said are known and well understood, but I still did not understand: Have you nominated and accepted to help (the specific attempt)? A Yes or No is enough.

Quote:
Models
Thanks for the models representation.

But there's a fundamental misunderstood

First example, due to our day life, we are not able
to get involved all the time. So, new volunteers are able
to come read Core instructions and develope

Also we are not all the time on a creative, lead, whatever mood
It changes all the time. To make things easy, set it free!
Resist is against evolution. Time has showed us that's true.

You do not need an absolutely free and flat organization to get involved at any time. "new volunteers are able
to come read Core instructions and develop
" Sounds good as long as they co-operate to achieve a specific target. In other case, the problem would be "who is going to take them all back and make one". (see also 'fork').

Quote:
Second example with model Ogre proposed by
Minahito which is a skilled gamer programmer
(read is blog about Artificial Intelligence)

You have placed "Project Lead" (bening dictator)
where it should be the Core !

At some point the Core should dictate what is required
to run perfectly and what it needs in terms of development.

That send you back to first example, and it loop is buckled!


Yes, Minahito seems to be an excellent programmer, but regarding the "Project Lead" I am right. See here.

"At some point the Core should dictate what is required
to run perfectly and what it needs in terms of development
" It can be achieved in many different ways (co-operation, understanding, good faith, ...).

Still I have not understand what is your proposal; I1 or I2 or an other one?

Dear Damaster, at this specific time we do not have the luxury for philosophic discussions. We urgently need specific and practical actions.



50
gtop00
Re: Proposal: Towards A Sustainable Open Source Project
  • 2007/10/28 21:33

  • gtop00

  • Friend of XOOPS

  • Posts: 498

  • Since: 2004/11/13


Quote:

Damaster wrote:
Quote:

gtop00 wrote:
Hey Catz, there is a misunderstanding; this is not a business case.
We are nobody's clerks and we do not need a boss (good or bad).

We all work here only and only because we like it. We just need to know if our efforts are lost or not.-


Wise! Let me ask, now that you have some pratice with organigrams, do you think this model or xoopscube.org one could be placed side-below-side to provide an overall vision of the existing possibilities, as "two models in pratice".

Thanks

Well since you challenge me, here are the results of my work on the proposed models:

Proposal I1 (Damaster/(Orpheus model))
Resized Image

Proposal I2 (Damaster/(XoopsCube – OGRE model))
Resized Image


What I still cannot understand:
- Have you nominated and accepted to help?
- Which is your specific proposal besides the mentioned models?




TopTop
« 1 2 3 4 (5) 6 7 8 ... 35 »



Login

Who's Online

180 user(s) are online (130 user(s) are browsing Support Forums)


Members: 0


Guests: 180


more...

Donat-O-Meter

Stats
Goal: $100.00
Due Date: May 31
Gross Amount: $0.00
Net Balance: $0.00
Left to go: $100.00
Make donations with PayPal!

Latest GitHub Commits