293992
I understand 'Re:' means 'reply' but:
why it grabs the title of the first post in the thread in some cases (withouth the 'Re:' string), and in other cases it grabs the title of the reply (with the 'Re:' at the beginning)?
Look HERE: two threads with both 'forum' as title of the first post, but different previews on the block: one appears as "forum" and the other as "Re: forum".
why it grabs the title of the first post in the thread in some cases (withouth the 'Re:' string), and in other cases it grabs the title of the reply (with the 'Re:' at the beginning)?
Look HERE: two threads with both 'forum' as title of the first post, but different previews on the block: one appears as "forum" and the other as "Re: forum".
293993
I thinks its forum and not blocks related, blocks just grab the title.
RE = REPLY
Just look the title of initial post of this thread and the other "replies".
RE = REPLY
Just look the title of initial post of this thread and the other "replies".
293995
It looks like this block shows some thread subjects with 'Re:' quote instead than clear ones.
For example, in my RC3 Test Site I've got 2 threads titled as 'forum'. the first one is showed on the R.D. Block as "re: forum". The second one appears as "forum", as it should be.
Is this a bug? a feature?
<small>[ Edited by MaxIT on 2002/6/5 17:26:41 ]</small>
For example, in my RC3 Test Site I've got 2 threads titled as 'forum'. the first one is showed on the R.D. Block as "re: forum". The second one appears as "forum", as it should be.
Is this a bug? a feature?
<small>[ Edited by MaxIT on 2002/6/5 17:26:41 ]</small>
293997
Quote:
what about SQLite that would be nice.
/Farsus
onokazu wrote:
XOOPS already has its own database abstraction layer. Though we only support mySQL now, we do have plans to support other databses like postgreSQL, interbase, firebird.
what about SQLite that would be nice.
/Farsus
293998
XOOPS already has its own database abstraction layer. Though we only support mySQL now, we do have plans to support other databses like postgreSQL, interbase, firebird.
293999
Hi folks,
Is there any plan of using PEAR for (amongst other things) independent database connection ?
This would be particulary handy on Intranet for exemple (ISS+SQL SERVER, Interbase,etc...) where you cannot always convince Admin to install mySQL....
Thanks,
Guillaume
Is there any plan of using PEAR for (amongst other things) independent database connection ?
This would be particulary handy on Intranet for exemple (ISS+SQL SERVER, Interbase,etc...) where you cannot always convince Admin to install mySQL....
Thanks,
Guillaume
294000
vietpixie, thanks much! Such a simple fix....and I overlooked the solution probably 5 or 6 times! heh heh
Thanks...
Thanks...
Login
Search
Recent Posts
Who's Online
Donat-O-Meter
| Stats | |
| Goal: | $100.00 |
| Due Date: | Apr 30 |
| Gross Amount: | $0.00 |
| Net Balance: | $0.00 |
| Left to go: | $100.00 |
 |
|