xoops forums

wishcraft

Module Developer
Posted on: 2015/7/11 1:49
wishcraft
wishcraft (Show more)
Module Developer
Posts: 3711
Since: 2007/5/18
#1

@scriptkiddy :: You would have to be punished for this comment and higher language functions #utf16

Just this comment; who ever put this comment in making so people can't suddenly store one what database will ever at the most correctly do utf8 only not things like higher language functions like utf16 or utf32 and so on; you look in the public view about no UNICODE support storage be punished:-

From: https://sourceforge.net/p/xoops/svn/HE ... /htdocs/kernel/object.php
define('XOBJ_DTYPE_ENUM'15);
// YOU SHOULD NEVER USE THE FOLLOWING TYPES, THEY WILL BE REMOVED
define('XOBJ_DTYPE_UNICODE_TXTBOX'16);
define('XOBJ_DTYPE_UNICODE_TXTAREA'17);
define('XOBJ_DTYPE_UNICODE_URL'18);
define('XOBJ_DTYPE_UNICODE_EMAIL'19);
define('XOBJ_DTYPE_UNICODE_ARRAY'20);
define('XOBJ_DTYPE_UNICODE_OTHER'21);


that is just the most silly comment like also saying you wont licence someone when installing with XOOPS_LICENSE_KEY.

What the problem mamba you accent changed did you just get here and look like an idiotic statement that any of my module have any errors at all especially the only invoicing gateway with features galore around the place written just by me xPayment...

Mamba

Moderator
Posted on: 2015/7/11 7:29
Mamba
Mamba (Show more)
Moderator
Posts: 10792
Since: 2004/4/23
#2

Re: @scriptkiddy :: You would have to be punished for this comment and higher language functions #utf16

Simon,

1) you're again violating our "XOOPS Etiquette" by using offensive language. We've been there before, you're aware of it, so let's not do it again.

You can disagree on issues, but please do it respectfully!

2) The SVN is there to see who changed what. You can address your issue with the person who has changed that code, or added the comment.
Support XOOPS => DONATE
Use 2.5.10 | Docs | Modules | Bugs

zyspec

Module Developer
Posted on: 2015/7/11 15:10
zyspec
zyspec (Show more)
Module Developer
Posts: 1043
Since: 2004/9/21
#3

Re: @scriptkiddy :: You would have to be punished for this comment and higher language functions #utf16

Simon,

It looks like that comment was introduced way back in XOOPS 2.4.5. If you think it's in error submit a bug report and ask the current core developers if it's safe to use these dtypes. They can then either remove the comment or actually remove the dtypes in question.