1
Catzwolf
Final Request: 2.2 additions still not in the 2.3 Branch?
  • 2009/5/12 13:38

  • Catzwolf

  • Home away from home

  • Posts: 1392

  • Since: 2007/9/30


As a move to finalise the merger between 2.2+ branch, we would like your input on what items you would like to see in the 2.3 branch or which items we have missed?

Can you please add your final 2.2+ wishlist here, thanks

Catz

2
Mamba
Re: Final Request: 2.2 additions still not in the 2.3 Branch?
  • 2009/5/17 10:15

  • Mamba

  • Moderator

  • Posts: 11378

  • Since: 2004/4/23


Anybody with any open issues from 2.2.x migration?

Please speak up!!!
Support XOOPS => DONATE
Use 2.5.10 | Docs | Modules | Bugs

3
trabis
Re: Final Request: 2.2 additions still not in the 2.3 Branch?
  • 2009/5/17 11:49

  • trabis

  • Core Developer

  • Posts: 2269

  • Since: 2006/9/1 1


I've been given the task of fixing bugs related to the migration script from 2.2.x to 2.3.x

Task does not include adding 2.2 missing features.

I notice some problems when migrating from 2.2 that are using custom templates. Also seems to be some problems with custom blocks.

I wonder if someone can get me a backup of a 2.2 site with custom blocks, custom profile fields and custom templates so I can use it for migration testing on localhost. Maybe an old backup from someone who had already migrated and had found problems doing it.

Thanks.

4
demian
Re: Final Request: 2.2 additions still not in the 2.3 Branch?
  • 2009/5/17 12:51

  • demian

  • Quite a regular

  • Posts: 225

  • Since: 2008/4/29


- Block Permission in block admin
- displayname:modify to have on/off feature in adminpanel


5
ghia
Re: Final Request: 2.2 additions still not in the 2.3 Branch?
  • 2009/5/19 20:02

  • ghia

  • Community Support Member

  • Posts: 4953

  • Since: 2008/7/3 1


I've already mailed this:

Primary are:
- Having a login name separated from nick and real name.
- Extended block managment:
- permissions per block
- more selection of pages to show
- easier selection managment by adding from drop down and having a list of all active blocks (the 2.3.3 with the 5 or 6 dropdowns doesn't cut for me)
- Editor integration. Editors should be readily available for News, CBB etc
- Admin interface as ThAdmin for maximum look and feel.
- Admin find users
- PM message system as handled in 2.2.x
- error logging
- multiselect (php + smarty)
- Not 2.2.x but needed: group permission view select for debug messages (default webmaster)
- SQL execution times per request
- problems in 2.3.3 with empty date fields for profile and search
- loadlanguage for modules (rare used eg CBB welcome function)
- Frameworks integration and compatibility file for Captcha from it.
- ...

There will be some other issues, but these will do for a start ...

Can't test it, but there seems also an upgrade issue with 2.2.3 due to a field (in only that version) for blocks is missing.

6
barryc
Re: Final Request: 2.2 additions still not in the 2.3 Branch?
  • 2009/6/29 13:07

  • barryc

  • Just can't stay away

  • Posts: 480

  • Since: 2004/3/20


Do you still need this? I have recently completed upgrading from a 2.2 site to 2.3.3. It was quite a saga due to certain modules not working after the upgrade.

I still have the 2.2 site in a renamed folder if it is of any use to you.

barryC
Barry Cooper
Sweet Home, Oregon

7
barryc
Re: Final Request: 2.2 additions still not in the 2.3 Branch?
  • 2009/6/29 13:11

  • barryc

  • Just can't stay away

  • Posts: 480

  • Since: 2004/3/20


My main complaint with 2.3.3 relates to certain problems in the Profiles module. See this post.
Barry Cooper
Sweet Home, Oregon

8
trabis
Re: Final Request: 2.2 additions still not in the 2.3 Branch?
  • 2009/6/29 13:15

  • trabis

  • Core Developer

  • Posts: 2269

  • Since: 2006/9/1 1


Hi barryc, I won't need data at the moment but please keep it because it may be useful latter. I have identified one single bug related to template sets. Did you run into any problem beside the not compatible modules?

PS: I missed the post before. Forget the question.

9
deka87
Re: Final Request: 2.2 additions still not in the 2.3 Branch?
  • 2009/7/1 19:04

  • deka87

  • Friend of XOOPS

  • Posts: 1125

  • Since: 2007/10/5


guys one more feature request. could you add one more field type in the user profiles module. i'd be cool if we had a "numbers only" field type along with other existing ones. thanks in advance
Mind anchors

10
Mamba
Re: Final Request: 2.2 additions still not in the 2.3 Branch?
  • 2009/7/1 19:06

  • Mamba

  • Moderator

  • Posts: 11378

  • Since: 2004/4/23


was this part of 2.2.x, or is it a new request for 2.3.x?
Support XOOPS => DONATE
Use 2.5.10 | Docs | Modules | Bugs

Login

Who's Online

412 user(s) are online (93 user(s) are browsing Support Forums)


Members: 0


Guests: 412


more...

Donat-O-Meter

Stats
Goal: $100.00
Due Date: Aug 31
Gross Amount: $0.00
Net Balance: $0.00
Left to go: $100.00
Make donations with PayPal!

Latest GitHub Commits