1
ccphui
Why XOOPS behave abnormal when include in a frame ?
  • 2007/5/3 9:12

  • ccphui

  • Just popping in

  • Posts: 7

  • Since: 2006/4/26


I am using http://www.no-ip.com to provide my web site
a dynamic IP address. Recently, I try to use one of
their feature port 80 redirect with mask URL option.

If I just use the redirect feature without mask URL, it
works fine, but the URL will become the dynamic IP address.
So I decided to use mask URL option, when I use this
the XOOPS page display abnormally.

And I asked the support of no-ip.com, they said mask URL
will create a frame and include my web page into the frame.

So can anyone here tell what should I do ?

Philip Hui.

2
trspice
Re: Why XOOPS behave abnormal when include in a frame ?
  • 2007/5/3 18:39

  • trspice

  • Not too shy to talk

  • Posts: 193

  • Since: 2007/3/24


You should post the link to the site so the problem can be diagnosed.
There's nothing but science....
The Reggae Album

3
Herko
Re: Why XOOPS behave abnormal when include in a frame ?
  • 2007/5/3 19:56

  • Herko

  • XOOPS is my life!

  • Posts: 4238

  • Since: 2002/2/4 1


BEcause XOOPS needs the URL used to be the real location of the website in order to check if the requests made to the scripts come from the correct site and logged in user.

If a redirect URL is used, this isn't the case, and the checks fail. This isn't a bug, it's actually a feature. Some hosting environments are just not fit for XOOPS hosting. Microsft .ASP hosting is one of them, and redirect hosting is another

Herko

Login

Who's Online

324 user(s) are online (258 user(s) are browsing Support Forums)


Members: 0


Guests: 324


more...

Donat-O-Meter

Stats
Goal: $100.00
Due Date: Nov 30
Gross Amount: $0.00
Net Balance: $0.00
Left to go: $100.00
Make donations with PayPal!

Latest GitHub Commits