29
Did I say Trabis leached code without attribution? No. You interpreted it that way. I did see the reference to IPF and it was adequate, but not sufficient. A short post in the forums is not full attribution, is it? Honestly, how many people actually know what 'IPF' is?
I am doing the best I can to restrain myself. This really isn't about the fork at all. Or, even about a 'module' framework, or the source of the code in xmf.
John N has some very valid concerns and you should listen to him. Do you think Ono, Mith and Skalpa left because they had nothing else to offer XOOPS? No, they left because people became short-sighted and stopped listening to them.
Once again, the XOOPS community is asking for transparency, not just code. They want to participate. It might seem scary or difficult to manage, but it can be done.
I hope you realize, as I posted earlier, that the core is a framework all its own, with a collection of other frameworks. There is a dependency of the core on modules and also a dependency of the modules on the core. They cannot be separated. If there was a 1-way dependency, only then could you separate them.
Back to being transparent, honest and having integrity - Will allow the word that cannot be spoken in the forums as a credit in your code? Trabis isn't using code that is 6 years old. He's using work Marc-Andre and I have committed in the past weeks and have been working on for several months. Openly, BTW. Can I provide a link to the SVN?
