Trabis,
this has nothing to do with freedom of speech but with focus on XOOPS and XOOPS community. And ensuring that XOOPS will not be used to promote somebody's else projects, especially when the projects have been created as a competitor to XOOPS.
As our "
Terms of Use" state very clearly:
Quote:
Content on XOOPS Project websites should never conflict with the Purpose of promoting and supporting the XOOPS Project and the XOOPS community.
XOOPS reserves the right to refuse or delete any Content of which it becomes aware and reasonably deems not to fulfill the Purpose.
Since we had way too many incidents where the line was crossed (and of which you're very well aware), the Council decided to censor the other project in order to bring back peace and harmony here, and be able to focus on XOOPS. And those who are here long enough appreciate the fact that the last two years have been very productive and peaceful, and nothing like the two years before that.
As we've always stated - we welcome any and all developers who come here to help XOOPS, regardless which other project they are contributing to. After all, this is Open Source, and we should be able to contribute where we want. Our only request - when you're here, respect XOOPS community.
Our job as moderators is to moderate and to ban users or projects that are crossing the lines and violate our rules.
For example, if somebody posts spam, he'll be banned.
If somebody changes his email address and re-register after being banned, and all of the email addresses are coming from a particular URL, this particular URL will be banned.
If one or several people post post again and again messages promoting their project or Website, we will censor that particular name/url, so they see that posting here won't bring them anything, so they walk away and leave as alone.
This has nothing to do with freedom of speech since you do
exactly the same on your Website that you manage.
We are committed to work with other projects when we can establish friendly and respectful relationships. We've spend a lot of time inviting back other forks (like EXM or Simple-XOOPS), and we want to continue on this route.
If we see in the future that the situation has improved regarding ICMS, the Council might reevaluate its position on this. But recent events, of which I've made Trabis aware of, don't really justify it at this point.
If anybody wants more details, please feel free to email me and I'll glad to respond in private. Otherwise feel free to read some of the old threads here to learn more about the history.