1
finnerss
2.2.1 Table prefix not Xoops
  • 2005/8/13 4:04

  • finnerss

  • Just popping in

  • Posts: 21

  • Since: 2003/1/8 2


Hi, I was wondering about what has been mentioned about some incompatibility with modules and all, and I noticed that when trying to install XOOPS 2.2.1 the table prefix recommended is "leave to default 'xoops' but the default I got there was Zmohq or Zmoqh something like that...

Can that cause problems with modules? Should change that to xoops_

Please advice before we install it :)

Thanks in advance

sergio

2
Dave_L
Re: 2.2.1 Table prefix not Xoops
  • 2005/8/13 4:45

  • Dave_L

  • XOOPS is my life!

  • Posts: 2277

  • Since: 2003/11/7


The install script generates a random prefix. You can use that prefix, or choose a different one yourself.

Using "xoops" as the prefix is not recommended, since it makes it easier for someone to hack your database.

Login

Who's Online

298 user(s) are online (256 user(s) are browsing Support Forums)


Members: 0


Guests: 298


more...

Donat-O-Meter

Stats
Goal: $100.00
Due Date: Nov 30
Gross Amount: $0.00
Net Balance: $0.00
Left to go: $100.00
Make donations with PayPal!

Latest GitHub Commits