Quote:
does it seem to make people want to see what is coming next, will it generate interest in the Open Source application that it leads to ...
It didn't for me... the burning "HOT" gif lead me to think about an early IBM commercial where two designers talk about what they want on their website and are excited about what they see elsewhere and "uuuhhh we should have burning letters like THAT!" and the other replying reproachfully "I don't know how to do that". Anyway, it just spells out 1995 to me
The whole appearance of the splash screen is too much like those not-workplace-safe websites (that I know nothing about, of course
) with little information about the site one is actually on. I think that it would work better with more text about the purpose of it and a description of the "Today's favourite" system with a link instead of an automatic redirection, so it is more concious for the user, what he is about to see.
For the XOOPS example site itself, I must admit that the default theme is really nothing to be proud of. Or maybe I am just tired of it after looking at it for too long. Check out our themes section for a range of exciting themes, we have for XOOPS.
Some more modules might also be good - but it would depend heavily on your target audience and draw quite a lot of resources from your (I assume) finite reserves.
In general, I would say that you should have more meta-information about the various systems instead of just a showcase. Say why you have picked the systems and what you find are the strengths and weaknesses of each (again quite a lot of work - but hey, it's you who wanted to do this
)
You already have most of it there with the selection of systems each fulfilling a certain need (shopping care, real estate, advertising, website management etc.) you "just" need to write some more about why you recommend these systems and for which purpose. Also, I wouldn't mind seeing more CMS/portal scripts there. We are not all alike, for example Mambo is in my opinion a great system for content aimed at many people, but managed by few people, whereas XOOPS is (again - personal opinion) more flexible to develop for and better suited for managing sites with many users submitting content in various ways.
A bit long and no quick-fixes, but you did ask for honest opinions.