8
Quote:
5. When you fork someone else work, please (no, no please anymore) RENAME the damn module, it's no longer the one created by the initial author.
++++++++++
Quote:
8. Every module must be packed with ZIP or 7Z, no rars, no crappy UHA or else unknown archiving formats or paid such as RAR.
++++++
Quote:
11. When u release a news story about your work, provide accurate mirroring on SourceFore.NET or Google Code, they're not going down like your shared hosting somewhere in Argentina or Mexico or Sudan. Add a link to support thread in forums on this site, ppl can't learn, speak and write in Every language on this planet, nor they to be forced to register everywhere to ask question or to submit bug report.
++++++++
As an comment:
I see a lot of -'blue move'- modules appearing. They are placed within SVN. Bugs and fixes which are applied are sometimes fixed, sometimes not. It is unclear. BUt the module stays within SVN as a rar file.
Look at mymenus. Within topic stated as final, but still some major bugs aren't solved. Why call it final if it is still beta, of RC. ?
As i already mentioned earlier, I am getting more and more confused which modules are blue move ready, bug fixed/debugged after release. I hate SVN. If ready (Final) take it out of the trunk (for off. download), put it on xoops.org within downloadsection Category: Blue Move
No I have to spit through topics and read pages of pages to find the proper/lates grmbl trunk-SVN rar version.
Quote:
Usually is like this, but here someone - just throw release after release without paying attention to discovered bugs or problems with they're work - wont mention nicknames anymore.
Totally agree. And every release gets the status Final. But no attention to given bugs (and sometimes suggested fixes).
And,...... keeping the same name of cloned modules, which results in even more confusion.