4
hi, tjnemez ~
i have visited your wonderful sites and savored your posts here. thanks a lot. i really love the concept and easy navigation of www.mindhealth.ca; it's really cool. & your graphic on www.dcdezines.ca is what lead me to read your posts. keep all that good energy coming! i really love your web design ability to maintain playful designs for *serious* sites.
as i promised in an earlier post to this forum, i have been reading the XOOPS documentation. to humbly offer my tableless css column tweaks (assumptions, right now) based on the XOOPS documentation file named: anatomy of the default template
[http://docs.xoops.org/modules/xdocman/manual.php?lang=en&doc=xn-103&file=index.html], i begin here. see if you have any feedback for me, okay, on all this?
from what i have read and understood, and the documentation paragraphs are quite clear and sweetly brief, theoretically all i need to do to adapt the tables in the default theme to pure tableless column css is to change the html <td> tags to css divs with similar names and define them in the xoops.css, making sure there are no conflicts. if my theory is correct, all i need do from there is two things: (1) be sure that all references in my XOOPS default theme folder (which is where i will put my trials and work from distribution install files _after_ copying/renaming the distribution default folder in themes default1 just in case i screw up) and (2) be sure the references to my <td> tag changes work everywhere else throughout the XOOPS distribution.
from what i've read:
The XOOPS default theme contains 6 HTML files: theme.html, theme_blockleft.html, theme_blockcenter_c.html, theme_blockcenter_l.html, theme_blockcenter_r.html and theme_blockright.html.
the documentation also notes where xoops.css is stored.
so i'll look through these for references to the tags i need to change first and then for what other in the XOOPS distribution files reference the <td> tags.
am i on the right track here? i hope so. i have only read the documentation once, but i'm going back now for a re-read.
~
merilene