1
banned1
Re: SEO vs XOOPS
  • 2012/2/5 22:28

  • banned1

  • Just popping in

  • Posts: 3

  • Since: 2012/2/2 1


Yes, they allow.
But generally you don't want to see that print friendly version of your content ranked on a search engine better than the original one.


.. The print friendly version usually doesn't have links to your website, worst landing page ever :)


I don't know what was meaning the original author of that page in wikipedia, but this can be an issue (in news there is already that rel=nofollow attribute)

banned,



2
banned1
Re: SEO vs XOOPS
  • 2012/2/5 21:53

  • banned1

  • Just popping in

  • Posts: 3

  • Since: 2012/2/2 1


Every 'print friendly' version of an article or news or etcetera can be considered a duplicate version of the same content.
Simple solution rel=nofollow attribute in the link

banned,




TopTop



Login

Who's Online

209 user(s) are online (137 user(s) are browsing Support Forums)


Members: 0


Guests: 209


more...

Donat-O-Meter

Stats
Goal: $100.00
Due Date: Apr 30
Gross Amount: $0.00
Net Balance: $0.00
Left to go: $100.00
Make donations with PayPal!

Latest GitHub Commits