71
Catzwolf
Re: WF-Channel Template issues
  • 2010/6/9 17:27

  • Catzwolf

  • Home away from home

  • Posts: 1392

  • Since: 2007/9/30


I'm sorry that you are having issues with the template, in reality, not every module will work out the box with every theme and *will* require some tweaking.



72
Catzwolf
Re: wf-channel 2.06 beta error
  • 2010/6/1 3:38

  • Catzwolf

  • Home away from home

  • Posts: 1392

  • Since: 2007/9/30


Hiya,

The modules you are using are slightly out of date.

http://code.google.com/p/xoosla-modules/downloads/list

Download both the modules, install the WF-Resource first and activate it, then install WF-Channel and then activate that module.

With any luck, WF-Channel should be working for you.

John



73
Catzwolf
Re: What a ranker!
  • 2010/5/24 16:54

  • Catzwolf

  • Home away from home

  • Posts: 1392

  • Since: 2007/9/30


You seriously do not understand? That is scary.

But re: private message conversation, I will take your recommendations and go back to working on Xoosla. It is apparent that neither you or DJ are going to change and lay the proper foundations for a working Xoops and stable development path.

Edit:

As for being furious, again trying to put words into something that wasn't there. I was not furious, I was saddened and dismayed at the way you dealt with this and you could have given us the common curtsey of talking to about this, you had my email, MSN or even in private message. Instead you choose neither of these options and then you switch us back again thinking everything will just be aright and nothing has changed. *shakes head*

ATB

John




74
Catzwolf
Re: What a ranker!
  • 2010/5/24 16:21

  • Catzwolf

  • Home away from home

  • Posts: 1392

  • Since: 2007/9/30


The problem Mamba, is that you haven't listened to one word from anyone, you don't listen and you certainly do not read. Rather than dealing with the issue square on, you would rather just hope that it goes away and everything will be good again.

To have all these things you talk about, you need two underlying things, 'Leadership and Teamwork' and you can gloss things over with your nice talk and pretty diagrams, but that doesn't actually solve the real problem here. Same mistakes over and over.



75
Catzwolf
Re: What a ranker!
  • 2010/5/24 16:11

  • Catzwolf

  • Home away from home

  • Posts: 1392

  • Since: 2007/9/30


Fyi, I would like to point out, this has nothing to do with which rank I am and having a dummy spitting contest. Truth be told, I never asked to be made a Xoops Core Developer, I was asked if I would come back to Xoops and continue on my work that is started with Zarilia/Xoosla and I said yes, why? Because I thought I could make a difference.

So, what is the definition of a fool? Someone who does the same thing over and over expecting different results, and right now, the way Xoops is managed, and the way it is perceived to the rest of the world, Xoops must be showing its true colours again. What a shame.

How many times must we go do the same thing, before it actually sinks in how bad things are? The ranks, what the real underling problems are and we keep doing the same things over and over and look where we are, back to the root of square one again.

Let’s look at the problems and see why we are no further forward than we were 6 years ago and then you Xoopsers decide what really matters and if it is just the sake of a few stupid ranks.

When this project first started there was Ono in sole leader developer, with a few people helping him out and that was fine while the project was in its infancy, but the project had grown, it was apparent that more developers were required to help out. At the time I suggested Skalpa to Ono, and I believed that these two developers could work together and this could only benefit Xoops. This was not the case and it wasn't long before Ono was forced to leave and Skalpa then assumed lead developer role. XOOPS Cube was born.

Let’s look at parallel development, and why it doesn't work for projects such as Xoops and in Open source and this case in general, it should still be fresh in every Xoops user’s memory.

We have done the exact same thing before, and it cost this project many years of development downtime, compatibility problems and split development resources. I advised against doing this back then, and I advice you against doing the exact same thing again. It DOESN'T work and it will come back to haunt us again in the future.

Xoops 2.18 and 2.2 were a disaster for Xoops, it caused so many problems and it did for a long time. When people did ask for a merger, these where largely ignored because version 3 was just around the corner. We all know how that worked out. Don't get me wrong, a lot of Miths work was incredible and if He and Skalpa worked had together on version 3, then maybe things would have been different today.

Again, so many broken promises, so many fundamental working practises gone ignored and the Xoops Community suffered in the due process and not a single element was learnt from this and used as a measure of prevention.

Xoops Version 3 was promised to the Xoops community in 2003, and they waited another 3 years before it came apparent that Skalpa couldn't finish what he started, either due to ill health, work commitments, moving how, no internet connection or lack of general time and then left us with just a mere starting point he called Xoops Sphere.

As for Xoops 2.18 and Xoops 2.2, It took approximately three years to get those two versions back into one build and so much time wasted doing so in the process and this could have been easily avoided if the proper precautions were taking in the first place.

Did we learn from that lesson, in all honesty no we didn’t. Not just once, but twice and by the same people who are currently running the project and that is staggering.

DJ assumed the leader developer role from Skalpa, did anything change? Unfortunately, no it didn’t and in fact, amazingly, DJ promptly continued in the same vain as his predecessor. He declared he would work on Version 3, while working on the 2.18 and 2.2 builds and against the concerns of the Xoops module developers and community. When a lot of the prominent Xoops module developers, theme designers offered to help and give their services, this was largely ignored or plain told their help wasn't needed. This came to a head and the result was ????? (Am I still allowed to mention this CMS here) and yet again, another fork of Xoops.

(Edit: Apparently the word I m p r e s s C M S is still censored from Xoops, how childish)

Why did this happen? Through failure to understand the needs of the Xoops Development Community, the ability to open and sustain diplomatic dialog, and the ability see issues before they happen and deal with them accordingly. If this had happened, then maybe there would not have been a split in the first place. Instead, we saw the biggest stain on the Xoops history ever. Oh yeah, what was your way of dealing with people unhappiness, unease at the way Xoops was being run and the general lack of co-operation from the core? Yup, you created the Xoops council, you then went about censoring them, deleting and altering their posts and then finally banned them, then like lord of the land you stated than from this day forward, anyone associated or mentioning them shall be excommunicated from Xoops. Very professional indeed.

Two years later, and still the promises of Xoops version 3, and yet still no sign of this Holy Grail or anything else for that matter. So now we have the same old reasons, through work commitments, job losses, and changes of addresses, family life and many other private personal problems that DJ is going through in his life, means Xoops version 3 is put on the back burner and still the community are still waiting.

The only major achievement is the mergers of 2.18 and 2.2 and this would be known as version 2.30. So you see, in 5 to 6 years we have managed the sum of screwing this up badly to fixing them and still no version 3 and about to do the same sum of screwing things up again.

So last year, you announce to the Xoops community that three major forks would be rejoining Xoops and that most of the prominent features would be merged into Xoops in the future and we are led to believe that Eduardo, Alfred and I would actually be working alongside DJ for the future of Xoops. Nope, that wasn't the case.

Eduardo, did the theme (only because he entered it into the theme competition and won) and was then asked to redo the whole Xoops website and if you remember a conversion we had on this subject, I suggested that maybe you could ask Eduardo to redo the Xoops theme, and you said no, 6 months later and he does it anyway. What a waste of time.

I think Alfred started integrating some of his features and stopped for some reason and maybe went back to Simple Xoops or is developing CBS forum, but all I know is he isn’t working on Xoops either.

I started the blue move, was working on the new repository module, was asked to kick start the dev.xoops org site and was to lead the 2.3 branch. I took on all these roles against advisement, from my family and friends and my health gave way. Also, regarding the dev.xoops.org site. You asked me to look at the coding for the Xoopsforge modules and my advice to you was that they were not safe to use, and could potentially be a securing threat and the coding was so out of date that it wasn’t worth fixing. You choose to ignore my advice and basically ordered me to use it.

During this period, where none of us three were asked to participate in the actual development of Xoops Version 3, and when I quizzed DJ regarding this matter, it became very clear that he was not being forthright about what he was doing or what he was going to do. I asked him if it were possible to see version 3 and his first answer 'No it wasn't ready'. I also asked why Xoops version 3 was not being developed openly and the branch was in CVS or SVN, I never got an answer.

It was only because I pushed them both regarding this matter, the truth was told. His vision of Xoops version 3 was just a modified version of Skapla's Xoops sphere and nothing more. Totally shocking to say the least and totally not what I had expected from him and should have been the starting point for a new direction in the development of Xoops version 3.

This to me should have been the ideal opportunity for all the Xoops developers to actually get together, work out what was wrong with Xoops, look at the requests from the Xoops community (Not for the first time) and create a working roadmap and work together on creating Version 3 through team work.

Did this happen, No it did not! Instead, DJ crawled back into the dark corners of Xoops to create the Holy Grail and work on the development alone and all I got from you Mamba in private discussion was that our Developer Ego's where getting in the way and that we should put them aside and work together. How could we even try to work as a team when the lead developer refuses to acknowledge we are even there?

How so out of touch you are, you were the one that asked us to come back to Xoops, you were the one that made the promises to us and never kept them. It wasn't our job to try and keep the core development going, create teams and a host of other things. The real underlying fact is this; this responsibility lies at the feet of DJ and Mamba and their failings to understand what is required.

The Qualities of a Good Team Leader:
1. Trust & Respect,
2. Ability To Inspire,
3. Confidence & Reassurance,
4. Identifying & Communicating Goals,
5. Knowing Your Team Members Inside Out,
6. Consistency,
7. Accept Criticism & Encourage Ideas & Input

So far, we have been shown little of this and it is dishearten to all of us developers who just want to ‘muck in, help and be a part of a working team’

So what is happening here right now? Not a lot. We have 4 different versions of Xoops being developed *YES 4* who are we Microsoft?? Come on how many different versions do we need to be working on? We now have 2.44. 2.50. 2.60 And 3.0. Are any of these coordinated from the same roadmap? No, each branch is developed from different people, with their own agenda and development thought. And, what is more worrying, we all have had no assurances that the work would be merged into version 3 or if anything from them will be used. (I was told from DJ himself that this wouldn’t happen, his reasoning was that most of these features were already part of version 3, nice for motivation huh)

Now really, answer this question? Is the Xoops Council oblivious to what is going on around them that they cannot understand why none of developers want to work on Xoops? Why we keep stating we want to work as a team and have many ideas to contribute to Xoops? Trabis, Eduardo, Alfred, FurMuss, Kris, Myself and load more developers or is it going to have to come down to what happened 3 years ago and another big split in Xoops? Because, this is a possibility.

Ask yourself this, whose ego is getting in the way of Xoops development and actually hindering the development process. I think you maybe need to be pointing the finger elsewhere.

Oh as for your list of achievements, am I the only one that finds that list rather sad? From what I have seen, all the biggest changes and achievements over the last three years have come from out-with the core development and from mostly individuals. (With the exception of the work that Trabis and Wishcraft have done and trying to keep the momentum going)

Really, just look at Joomla and see what can happen through team work, they have managed to start Joomla, the re-factor the code from scratch and are now in the process of another big update.

Shame you brought most of the big developers and didn't use them, that surely should be laid at your feet not ours.

As to regards of being professional, maybe you Mamba should actually look at that and understand what that means. You talk of being professional, polite and adhering to the Xoops etiquette. Yet, if you were as professional in your work as you would suggest to others, then this thread would never have raised its head or even been from the first post to continue and the discussion taken to a more private part of Xoops. Or, was it merely left in place to score brownie points just in the same way that you decided to sue Herko?

Ironically, that didn’t half back fire and who will be left picking up the court fees on that one? And again, if it is not about scoring brownie points, why it that damn stupid petition still left up?

And again as I asked you in private message, please remove the Xoops developer from my rank status and deal with this situation properly and professionally with all us developers and talk to us with the proper communication and dialog in a professional and proper manner and not like a two bit cowboy operation.

Sorry for the long post on this matter

John



76
Catzwolf
Re: What a ranker!
  • 2010/5/22 17:05

  • Catzwolf

  • Home away from home

  • Posts: 1392

  • Since: 2007/9/30


Quote:

phppp wrote:

Sorry I can not spend too much time on the subject right now.
We need to finish the 2.45 release in the weekend.
After that we will have more and more on our new version of XOOPS, for sure.


This is indeed been the problem all along, I was actually hoping that we could have taken sometime to reflect and discuss the whole future of core development of Xoops and not to be worrying about the release of one version of Xoops.

I fear to be honest that, I like many other are banging our proverbial heads against a brick wall.

With all due respect DJ, you fiddle while Rome burns :)

I bid you goodnight and well being, I'm off to watch some stargate universe and relax :)

ATB

John



77
Catzwolf
Re: What a ranker!
  • 2010/5/22 16:59

  • Catzwolf

  • Home away from home

  • Posts: 1392

  • Since: 2007/9/30


DJ I have every respect for you as a developer and I have for a long time. In a open source way, you really have done this all wrong. There was no need for you to go off and do all that by yourself when we could have done it as a team.

Right now, Xoops has no core development team spirit, no direction, no nothing, not even a roadmap (which is damn right disgusting). We have 4 different version all going at the same time, and what will happen to the work that has been don on these version?

In all honesty, we should have halted production and development on 2.18, and then all focussed our attention on version three. When you split development, you split resources and development times. In a large scale project like this, there is no way this should happen. With this result, other projects like Joomla has now worked on 3 (yes three) large scale versions and currently is leaving Xoops in the backend of no where.

In a open source project, that is a recipe for disaster and will lead to the down fall of any project and from what I can see, this is already happening.

Is it really that hard to put a team together and work from the same hymn sheet or we asking for the impossible?



78
Catzwolf
Re: What a ranker!
  • 2010/5/22 16:47

  • Catzwolf

  • Home away from home

  • Posts: 1392

  • Since: 2007/9/30


Actually, I remember a conversation we had the other day on MSN, you accused me and the other developers of having 'Ego' problems because we wouldn't work together.

The truth is this Mamba, we do want to work together and I think that we have just shown you that. In all honesty, it is DJ that doesn't want to work with us...

I am now officially done banging my head off a brick wall with this topic and refuse to do it any more.

Either, DJ wants us to work with him or not




79
Catzwolf
Re: What a ranker!
  • 2010/5/22 16:39

  • Catzwolf

  • Home away from home

  • Posts: 1392

  • Since: 2007/9/30


Pissing? Who is starting a pissing contest!? No need to start with this Mamba, it was an observation, and you can't handle that then that is your problem, not mines.

I think you have really missed the point here, the point is not that DJ has done it or not, the point is that there should have been no way one developer of a CMS should have gone off on his own and decided what is best for everyone.

All the "Xoop developers" should have had a say in the development and it should have been as a team, with the proper channels of development like every other CMS .

Is that any clearer for you?



80
Catzwolf
Re: What a ranker!
  • 2010/5/22 14:56

  • Catzwolf

  • Home away from home

  • Posts: 1392

  • Since: 2007/9/30


Quote:

DJ changed jobs 3-4 weeks ago, and moved to another city. Understandably, he had less time for XOOPS while he was looking for a job, and then needed to find new apartment, and now is in process of learning his new job.

Sometimes we forget that he is also just a volunteer on this project as everybody else here.


I'm sorry for Dj for having to go through that, and I can sympathise with him, But, at the end of the day, Xoops should not stop because of one man's life has turned upside down, and really, this reiterates the need for change in the development structure and how we work together.

For example:

1. Where is the Xoops Roadmap for v3
2. Why do we not have a place of discussion, that users, coders, graphic artists and theme designers can work on the ins and outs of every step of development?
3. Why is there no repository in sourceforge for Xoops v3? Or one that is being used and kept up to date.
4. Why are developers just being handed out willy nilly version of Xoops that they can work on? Again, wouldn't it be quicker and easier for all of us to work on one version at a time.
5. Why are more than 4 different version of Xoops being worked on without no real direction? If we are going to work on more than one version, then one should only be two, the first for bugs and security issues only and the other is the actual working branch/version.

But, honestly, DJ should have had something workable by now. I did Zarilia in a year on my own. Xoosla refactoring in three months, Eduardo did Exm in a shorter time and the same with Simple Xoops.

Sorry but the way Xoops is developed has to change, or by the time Xoops v3 does come out, there might not be anyone there to use it.

John




TopTop
« 1 ... 5 6 7 (8) 9 10 11 ... 185 »



Login

Who's Online

167 user(s) are online (104 user(s) are browsing Support Forums)


Members: 0


Guests: 167


more...

Donat-O-Meter

Stats
Goal: $100.00
Due Date: Apr 30
Gross Amount: $0.00
Net Balance: $0.00
Left to go: $100.00
Make donations with PayPal!

Latest GitHub Commits