39
Quote:
>Any more, you guys would recommend?
*
http://e107.org - usualy works well - and has enough ready to work features
*
http://tikiwiki.org - was once the project of the month @sf, meets many standarts, diversity of modules.
*
http://www.ez.no/ probably has power, similar to typo..
Google PageRank is a good popularity criteria ;( (if You have google-bar on IE - you can see it for each page)
ps.:
probably what we call CMS are PS :)
actually mambo is paying more attention to keeping up to CMS description, as I know.
pps.:
* in my first post when saying "all profs .." I meant "most of profs..) :)
* and I am still interested what/
when could be the capabilities of
collaboration between CMS's?
. (ups, PS's
)
Diversity is OK. but reinventing bycicle or doing the_same_ thing by several groups is not efficient.