36
BS you should keep your BS opinions to yourself unless you know what you are talking about. especially when you are misleading people with incorrect information.
Quote:
I am strongly of the opinion, that all this outage is due to two lines of code placed in Giba's file by someone with access to XOOPS server and SourceForge. (without Giba's knowledge)
what has giba's file in sourceforge got to do with xoops.org outage? absolutely nothing. for 1 those files in gibas distribution only affected gibas distribution, they were not located on xoops.org servers or XOOPS project SF servers. so the outages of xoops.org were not related.
Quote:
Having identified the files, the code and the method of access, I believe it is prudent to let DJ put the xoops.org on a server where if and when it goes down again in this matter, we know exactly where to expect the recovery to be handled.
prudent? yes we all know what prudence is..
and yes lol put xoops.org on a server where we know exactly where to expect recovery.. yup the foundation servers are managed full time by surpass hosting.. coincidentally DJ's private/personal server which is where xoops.org now is is also at surpass hosting.. so the support & recovery would be done by exactly the same people at surpass hosting. so NO it was not necessary to not use the foundation servers, except for the fact that DJ wants the foundation gone, and he wanted 150% control. again your opinion was ill informed and incomplete.
Quote:
am very resentful to the fact that XI was started by the person that publically stated he could take down a server with two lines of php code programing. I never doubted this fact and someone with that knowledge should have protected the backups. Instead there were none.
really why mention that in the same post when you also mention about 2 lines of code in gibas distribution. it does seem to an onlooker that you are insinuating that the two are tied somehow. google could give you those 2 lines of code.. lol the backups were done when he was in charge.. lol but they wasn't done since he quit. so those backups you refer to are not his responsibility. at least give the full account when you are voivcing your opinions.
Quote:
Advertising is gone, and the foundation that hasn't existed to help the project anyway in the year I have been here is gone. Ono made that decision. It there is to be a foundation it will have to be newly created, along with what ever else the DPT has in mind.
the foundation is still here deary.. ono made that decision? really? please give proof of that.. it was not ono's decision to make.. ono only owns the domain name, not the project. again you are probably misunderstanding.
ono passed the rights to use the domain name over to DJ. but only DJ will have made the decision to try and remove the foundation.. if you don't know exactly, then don't make statements that can be taken as gospel.
that's a pretty bold statement about the foundation being newly created again..
yet again DJ has gone against the wishes of the proposal committee, he is repetitive in his insistence to do everything that he wants when he wants.
if he won't listen to the proposal committee now, why the hell will he listen to the committee when/if they ask him to reverse all the changes he has made so far? the answer is he will not, the committee is another waste of everyones time.