Thanks to for this solution.

WeBlog is a great module. We should keep it going.

Thanks so much for sharing this news!

Will follow the path..

Yeah but you know, still nothing quite like soapbox from what ive seen.

will see what we can do with the latest rc version I guess.
Thanks

oh yeah the upgrade train. The problem with that is often new versions dont work with countless decent modules.

not too mention the effort of customization.

2.13.2 I believe is the last we have. So our team should look into it.

There are far too many modules that are similar to each other that aren't necessarily better than each other. Its a pity we dont focus more on the core modules.

I can't tell you after 3 years how many news/article/wf section clones there are for instance! Now I don't think it's a bad thing,of course not, but you(as in a webmaster) just have to decide at one point which to use, so you can focus on the sites development, especially if it's a community..not always worrying about patches and upgrades but really using what you got to the max. IMO: it's better for us to focus on soapbox if we can.

We'll look into it though, there is lots to consider.

Thanks, appreciate your input.
--Our teeam REALLY needs to catch up more with the latest developments.

Im sure its a fine module, Dont really feel like reposting those submitted columns though. (of course I would if I had too)

found salzars module to be excellant. And rather simple and straight to the point. Im sure someone has it somewhere?

well look into articles as well though, thanks!
(we dont really have that many columns posted yet)

Hello!
Wizanda, did you fix the the admin approval bug? (as stated at the dev site as still being a bugger) Where can I download the latest?

Soapbox 1.5RC4
vs
Soapbox 1.5.1 jp ?

I couldnt but tried like heck to track down the JP one. Are they the same in theory?

Thanks in advance! The version we are using is a bit buggy and I bet rc4 will fix much of that...but having trouble follwing the trail...

hey 1 out of 2 aint bad.

if you sent another by email maybe we didnt ge it.
Thanks a lot for your support.

Hi,sorry to bump an old topic but just wanted to let you know we finally got the polling up! Please swing by and cast yor vote for the logo you think works best.

Even though the ultimate decison will be made by our site moderators we wanted to let you know that the polling is up for our logo contest and would love some feedback by way of polling.

THANK YOU all for participatingby way of submitting or polling. And, be sure to click on the contact us link on our site and send us the url and name you might want associated with your submission, as we will be writing up a thank you article in about a week and a half!

(you dont need to log in to vote)
temp polling page


Note: we identified by number to keep it fair among our members. But again, click on cantact us and submit your url and name or username youd like in our future shout out article.

We are thinking about a week and a half before the article and winning announcement are made. Then we begin work on our new theme.

thanks again!

FYI- we will still be accepting submissions at editor at theatreport dot com
until tommorrow morning.

On site, annonymous, polling (entries will be numbered until results) will go on for about a week, ultimately the site moderators will decide on the winner, however.

If you have a surge of font creativity etc. send em our way. also include a web link you'd like referred to for the shout out article to follow a week later!

(all entries will be mentioned in an forthcoming theatreport article along with a web link if desired.)

thanks so much!

Yes you must specify the tables width in px. set margins to auto that may help too (mor so with divs then table but)

Also, just a heads up. I would keep your tables inside as percentages until you figure out the right measurements.
try 99.9% for more compatability.

Next if you want to get exact px widths for inner tables and your feeling a little lazy (like we all do from time to time) check out the Firefox extension called "Measure it".
It literally lets you measure your pixels. Pretty sweet tool.

Visit here if you already have forefox.

If not useful for this problem will surely be useful in the future!

Good luck.

Theres always been a debate regarding fixed width and percentage (liquid) layouts. Its very difficult to get a true liquid layout in XOOPS however because most modules/themes are utilizing html rather than css.

Fixed width is great for a layout specific site and I know our site is going to switch back to one. It really stretches far too much at a high resolution and not all the theme is css.

Never the less, I think its safe to say now that 800x600 screen resolutions are a marginal standard at best,accounting for far fewer surfers than before, making 1024x768 a miininum standard. Which means your 900px range is good. IMO.

(However you will have to adjust the tables inside and make sure they dont exceed in total the width of the table, and that padding and margins dont affect this as well. Which is why I suggest converting your nested tables to percentages until you figure the closest exact pixel range.)

Unecessary jabber, sorry.

Try that extension , its a great tool.

-have a good one.