122
Quote:
Welcome to the club
Quote:
Also refered to as BBcodes, this is a "simple" way of adding colour, links, images, etc., replacing the need to use HTML (which idiot came up with this idea)
Examples:
write text in bold text
-> code: [ b ]text[ / b ]
(note: spaces added, so it doesn't render!)
Hope this example gives a little clarification.
Quote:
Takes away (to strip) any HTML tags inserted in the text area, as if you copy paste a text, and it includes HTML tags you don't want.
Quote:
Use search, warDick and I just recently answered this question.
It's nothing XOOPS specific. It's an online colloboration tool.
Haven't you ever heard of www.wikipedia.org ?
Google for wiki, and take a look for more info.
Quote:
WYSIWYG==What You See Is What You Get
WYSIWYG Editor==Ever used Word, Open Office Writer, Dreamweaver, they are basicly WYSIWYG (for more info google)
Spaw is an implementation of the above, to be used online. This has been implemented as a class for XOOPS.
I just starting my XOOPS homepage.
Welcome to the club
Quote:
1. XOOPS Codes
Also refered to as BBcodes, this is a "simple" way of adding colour, links, images, etc., replacing the need to use HTML (which idiot came up with this idea)
Examples:
write text in bold text
-> code: [ b ]text[ / b ]
(note: spaces added, so it doesn't render!)
Hope this example gives a little clarification.
Quote:
2. Strip HTML Tags
Takes away (to strip) any HTML tags inserted in the text area, as if you copy paste a text, and it includes HTML tags you don't want.
Quote:
3. Wiki
Use search, warDick and I just recently answered this question.
It's nothing XOOPS specific. It's an online colloboration tool.
Haven't you ever heard of www.wikipedia.org ?
Google for wiki, and take a look for more info.
Quote:
4. Spaw WYSIWYG Editor
WYSIWYG==What You See Is What You Get
WYSIWYG Editor==Ever used Word, Open Office Writer, Dreamweaver, they are basicly WYSIWYG (for more info google)
Spaw is an implementation of the above, to be used online. This has been implemented as a class for XOOPS.
123
Sorry for not replying earlier....
just make this small change
JS debugger will still give an error, but at least your header appears!
Let me know how it goes for you...
...
<{$xoops_module_header}>
<script type="text/javascript">
<{$xoops_js}>
</script>
<script>
function addEngine()
...
just make this small change
<{$xoops_module_header}>
<script type="text/javascript">
<{$xoops_js}>
</script>
-->
<script>
function addEngine()
JS debugger will still give an error, but at least your header appears!
Let me know how it goes for you...
125
OK guys, I know if ya were around, I would here a big DOUGH!!
...see the comment code, that's what's causing the problem (easily found with JS debugger!)
Change to this..
...and it works
<script type="text/javascript">
//--></script><script type="text/javascript" src="http://www.weblook.org/include/xoops.js"></script><script type="text/javascript"><!--
</script>
...see the comment code, that's what's causing the problem (easily found with JS debugger!)
Change to this..
<script type="text/javascript">
</script><script type="text/javascript" src="http://www.weblook.org/include/xoops.js"></script><script type="text/javascript">
</script>
...and it works
126
WOW, quite some improvement! You're on the right track 
As I noticed that you are still playing around, I will refrain from further comments at this point (too many cooks spoil the soup!!!)
But, as I have never come across such a reply, displaying a true appreciation of input, I will provide more if requiered
Quote:
*sigh* yeah, we all need to do that from time to time...I played a little around with Firefox's WebDEV extension, but couldn't find the appropriate settings on the quick, and unfortunatly can't invest more time currently.
Though, I did realize, that there is much improvement, if you set the the sideblocks to 200px, but then you need to enlargen the font. ARRRR, so much for keeping quiet....but you might want to try it out
Quote:
Ahh, sorry for causing confussion here, but that idea is way of line, so please ignore that statement. If I ever come across an example what I meant, then I will let ya know
Keep up the good work, I'm excited about your future changes...
As I noticed that you are still playing around, I will refrain from further comments at this point (too many cooks spoil the soup!!!)
But, as I have never come across such a reply, displaying a true appreciation of input, I will provide more if requiered
Quote:
I agree with you, but I had to compramise on this one.
*sigh* yeah, we all need to do that from time to time...I played a little around with Firefox's WebDEV extension, but couldn't find the appropriate settings on the quick, and unfortunatly can't invest more time currently.
Though, I did realize, that there is much improvement, if you set the the sideblocks to 200px, but then you need to enlargen the font. ARRRR, so much for keeping quiet....but you might want to try it out
Quote:
I'm not quite sure I'm picking up what you're throwin' down. Would you mind clarifying a little, please.
Ahh, sorry for causing confussion here, but that idea is way of line, so please ignore that statement. If I ever come across an example what I meant, then I will let ya know
Keep up the good work, I'm excited about your future changes...
128
1) you know that piCal comes with skins? (check image folder, and look at documentation, or check at GIJOE's site
2) theme can comfortably be used with 800px, anything larger, and reading the center column is "painfull" (-> subjective, but I feel, that short text should not cover more than 400px in width)
=> 800px screens don't have to display ALL horizontal content at once; users of 800px screens are aware that they are using outdated equipement, and will put up with having to scroll to the right; try to stick "not so important" info, in the part that is covered (headlines as they are, I would regard as such; you want users to primarily concentrate on the news!)
3) sideblocks need better visual seperation from main content
4) " "Technology is dominated by two types of people: those who understand what they do not manage, and those who manage what they do not understand." --Putt's Law"
=> VERY true statment, and fits the site
2) theme can comfortably be used with 800px, anything larger, and reading the center column is "painfull" (-> subjective, but I feel, that short text should not cover more than 400px in width)
=> 800px screens don't have to display ALL horizontal content at once; users of 800px screens are aware that they are using outdated equipement, and will put up with having to scroll to the right; try to stick "not so important" info, in the part that is covered (headlines as they are, I would regard as such; you want users to primarily concentrate on the news!)
3) sideblocks need better visual seperation from main content
4) " "Technology is dominated by two types of people: those who understand what they do not manage, and those who manage what they do not understand." --Putt's Law"
=> VERY true statment, and fits the site
129
I've just recently downloaded xcGallery from dev.xoops, and I'm very suprised to read about your problems, as it worked a beauty with me.
From my experience, files often get corrupted when using dial-up. Also FTP is a pain, and a culprit when it comes to fiel corruption.
Leaving you with the only option to try again and again, until the downloaded files are OK....
@mcpeak:
This is the actual filestructure (folders only!), after unzipping:
-XOOPS2_mod_xcgal_1RC1
--xcgal (->this folder needs to be in XOOPS_ROOT/modules/)
---admin
---albums
----test
----userpics
-----10001
---blocks
---images
---include
---js
---language
----english
----german
---sql
---templates
----blocks
Oh, yes, the file over at dev.xoops is a zip file!!!, not tar.gz (some win-untar-progs like to corrupt tar files! Try 7 zip)
Hope this helps...
From my experience, files often get corrupted when using dial-up. Also FTP is a pain, and a culprit when it comes to fiel corruption.
Leaving you with the only option to try again and again, until the downloaded files are OK....
@mcpeak:
This is the actual filestructure (folders only!), after unzipping:
-XOOPS2_mod_xcgal_1RC1
--xcgal (->this folder needs to be in XOOPS_ROOT/modules/)
---admin
---albums
----test
----userpics
-----10001
---blocks
---images
---include
---js
---language
----english
----german
---sql
---templates
----blocks
Oh, yes, the file over at dev.xoops is a zip file!!!, not tar.gz (some win-untar-progs like to corrupt tar files! Try 7 zip)
Hope this helps...
Login
Search
Recent Posts
Who's Online
Donat-O-Meter
| Stats | |
| Goal: | $100.00 |
| Due Date: | May 31 |
| Gross Amount: | $0.00 |
| Net Balance: | $0.00 |
| Left to go: | $100.00 |
 |
|