112
I chose TinyEditor as my editor of choice for News 1.53 and CBB 3.08. It was so easy to configure and works great with these excellent modules.
It's the only editor I know of that installs as a module for easy administrative configuration.
I sincerely hope that development continues with this fine editor.
I want to thank the talented individuals (Ralf57) that created this editor for the XOOPS community.
It's the only editor I know of that installs as a module for easy administrative configuration.
I sincerely hope that development continues with this fine editor.
I want to thank the talented individuals (Ralf57) that created this editor for the XOOPS community.
113
Quote:
Even better!
mortuk wrote:
kirbs32686: or wait for next releas - 2.2 & 2.0 will be joind again
Even better!
114
Quote:
Here is a downgrade script to revert a XOOPS 2.2+ installation
to XOOPS 2.0.x.
Downgrade Script
You will have to judge for yourself whether it is worth the risk or time involved to revert your installation.
kirbs32686 wrote:
So, final answer is that there is no possible way for me to upgrade to 2.0.16 from 2.2.2 safely what so ever without deleting the site and starting from scratch?
Here is a downgrade script to revert a XOOPS 2.2+ installation
to XOOPS 2.0.x.
Downgrade Script
You will have to judge for yourself whether it is worth the risk or time involved to revert your installation.
115
Personally, I think you would be better off just deleting that site and its database and starting anew with 2.0.16.
Again--just my opinion.
Again--just my opinion.
116
Quote:
Yes, that is the version of XOOPS that you have.
There are two development branches for XOOPS. They are 2.0.x and 2.2.x. Within the 2.2.x branch, the stable versions are evenly numbered; whereas, beta, rc, etc. will be oddly numbered.
The latest is 2.2.5-rc2 found here.
I believe the majority are shying away from the 2.2.x branch and going with the 2.0.x branch, but that is just my opinion.
By the way, XOOPS 2.0.16 is in the 2.0.x development branch.
kirbs32686 wrote:
<?php // $Id: version.php,v 1.24 2005/08/14 21:24:14 skalpa Exp $ define("XOOPS_VERSION","XOOPS 2.2.2"); ?>
This is whats in my version.php
Is it saying that I have version 2.2.2? I guess thats the version of "2.0" I have? SO confused...
Yes, that is the version of XOOPS that you have.
There are two development branches for XOOPS. They are 2.0.x and 2.2.x. Within the 2.2.x branch, the stable versions are evenly numbered; whereas, beta, rc, etc. will be oddly numbered.
The latest is 2.2.5-rc2 found here.
I believe the majority are shying away from the 2.2.x branch and going with the 2.0.x branch, but that is just my opinion.
By the way, XOOPS 2.0.16 is in the 2.0.x development branch.
117
Quote:
Same here--no problems.
Dave_L wrote:
I have XOOPS_TRUST_PATH parallel to XOOPS_ROOT_PATH without any problems, But you can locate XOOPS_TRUST_PATH anywhere you like, if your server doesn't permit that.
Same here--no problems.
120
Specifically,
Username=agt10024 and james10024
Website=//george-walker-bush.info
Email= agt10024@lacanapa.info and james10024@felissilvestriscatus.info
I googled "george-walker-bush.info" and found these two usernames all over the net.
Quote:
Funny Stuff!
Username=agt10024 and james10024
Website=//george-walker-bush.info
Email= agt10024@lacanapa.info and james10024@felissilvestriscatus.info
I googled "george-walker-bush.info" and found these two usernames all over the net.
Quote:
joffre wrote:
Seems he doesn't know what to do with his ten fingers...
Funny Stuff!
Login
Search
Recent Posts
Who's Online
Donat-O-Meter
| Stats | |
| Goal: | $100.00 |
| Due Date: | Apr 30 |
| Gross Amount: | $0.00 |
| Net Balance: | $0.00 |
| Left to go: | $100.00 |
 |
|