13
The version is XOOPS 2.3.3b.
Yes, i know that the tag onload is valid only into body.
I think that current situation of image.php it's very bad,
and would be better to rewrite the code of this file!!!!
You have some ideas?
Thanks
Razbox
Yes, i know that the tag onload is valid only into body.
I think that current situation of image.php it's very bad,
and would be better to rewrite the code of this file!!!!
You have some ideas?
Thanks
Razbox
14
Forgive me in advance for my bad English language.
I'm an admin Italian XOOPS.
I found a problem on the file
/class/textsanitizer/image/image.php
The file is called when you post pictures by admin on blocks through tool.
The syntax is not valid and compatible with the W3C standards.
Example output code deprecated:
Quote:
Tag interested=onload
Indeed, the pictures posted with the automated tool to insert blocks are not compatible with other browsers (eg Firefox).
Someone rewrote the affected file w3c compliant?
Thanks
Razbox from Italy
P.s. Sorry for my bad english language
Forgive me in advance for my bad English language.
I'm an admin Italian XOOPS.
I found a problem on the file
/class/textsanitizer/image/image.php
The file is called when you post pictures by admin on blocks through tool.
The syntax is not valid and compatible with the W3C standards.
Example output code deprecated:
Quote:
<img src='http://www.mysite/10.gif' border='0' alt='' onload="javascript:if(this.width>152) this.width=152" />
Tag interested=onload
Indeed, the pictures posted with the automated tool to insert blocks are not compatible with other browsers (eg Firefox).
Someone rewrote the affected file w3c compliant?
Thanks
Razbox from Italy
P.s. Sorry for my bad english language
Login
Search
Recent Posts
Who's Online
Donat-O-Meter
| Stats | |
| Goal: | $100.00 |
| Due Date: | May 31 |
| Gross Amount: | $0.00 |
| Net Balance: | $0.00 |
| Left to go: | $100.00 |
 |
|