XOOPS 
Forum
Forum Index General Forums Community Support Modules Support Themes Support Development International Support Module Hack Reviews Theme Designer Talk
  1. Board index / 
  2. Xoops Development / 
  3. Feature Request 
  4.  / Feature Requests : My 2 Cents
Register
21
brash
Re: Feature Requests : My 2 Cents

  • 2004/12/2 23:59

  • brash

  • Friend of XOOPS

  • Posts: 2206

  • Since: 2003/4/10


Yep, coming from the 0.5~4 seconds you were getting down to 0.09 seconds by simply utilizing XOOPS caching system is a very good achievement, and just goes to show that XOOPS is more than just a pretty face. That is of a reduction in page exection time to between 2.25% ~ 18% of what it was before. That is a trully mamoth performance increase.
22
ewonline
Re: Feature Requests : My 2 Cents

  • 2004/12/3 0:18

  • ewonline

  • Not too shy to talk

  • Posts: 198

  • Since: 2004/11/17


This post is a duplicate since it just wouldnt load after I pressed post, is xoops.org acting slow?
23
ewonline
Re: Feature Requests : My 2 Cents

  • 2004/12/3 0:18

  • ewonline

  • Not too shy to talk

  • Posts: 198

  • Since: 2004/11/17


Well, I still hate the long urls and short urls hack is a headache to deal with. I dont even want to try and fix things so it works

And Google is just not indexing my site, I've submitted it more than once and its never on google.
Is the idea that search engines dont index long urls myth or truth?

From time to time, the xoops.org seems really slow too
How about putting ur page gen time counter and queries on the site?
24
brash
Re: Feature Requests : My 2 Cents

  • 2004/12/3 0:37

  • brash

  • Friend of XOOPS

  • Posts: 2206

  • Since: 2003/4/10


I personally think you are better off using a URL rewriter on the webserver level rather than at the XOOPS level. Can be argued either way though I think.

Have you had a read through this page for Google indexing info?
25
ewonline
Re: Feature Requests : My 2 Cents

  • 2004/12/4 22:29

  • ewonline

  • Not too shy to talk

  • Posts: 198

  • Since: 2004/11/17


I realized what I did to get the time down, cache the main menu. Which is a very bad idea though it does save ten queries.
That could be a area for imporvement for the next versions of xoops.
26
jdhf99
Re: Feature Requests : My 2 Cents

  • 2004/12/5 15:46

  • jdhf99

  • Just popping in

  • Posts: 6

  • Since: 2004/9/9 1


How can you check the HTML requests for your site? I'm trying to speed mine up :)
27
ewonline
Re: Feature Requests : My 2 Cents

  • 2004/12/8 5:33

  • ewonline

  • Not too shy to talk

  • Posts: 198

  • Since: 2004/11/17


As in page generation time?
28
ewonline
Re: Feature Requests : My 2 Cents

  • 2004/12/8 5:33

  • ewonline

  • Not too shy to talk

  • Posts: 198

  • Since: 2004/11/17


As in page generation time?
29
ewonline
Re: Feature Requests : My 2 Cents

  • 2004/12/8 5:35

  • ewonline

  • Not too shy to talk

  • Posts: 198

  • Since: 2004/11/17


The slowness of xoops.org is really starting to bug me. I hit submit and the page never shows, so i hit submit again and there we go, duplicate posts.
I am going to release a article about XOOPS and its speed. With all due respect to the developers who have worked really hard on Xoops, its just not fast enough or enough caching or code that is fast and to the point.
How about putting a page generation timer on the xoops.org site. Show the world how fast it is?
30
brash
Re: Feature Requests : My 2 Cents

  • 2004/12/9 22:20

  • brash

  • Friend of XOOPS

  • Posts: 2206

  • Since: 2003/4/10


@jdhf99

I use a tool called IBM Page Detailer Basic which is a freeware *although you do have to register first) tool from IBM Alphaworks. Just do a goog search and you should get there pretty quick .


@ewonline

Quote:

I am going to release a article about XOOPS and its speed.


By this do you mean release a guide on how to improve performance of your XOOPS system? I hope so as the way you have worded it it sounds like you intend to intentionally go out of your way to badmouth Xoops. Obviously I assume the first option as it wouldn't make sense to badmouth a community that had done nothing other than provide you with a free CMS, that had also gone to significant lengths to help you out when you asked for help.
« 1 2 (3) 4 5 »

Login

Register now!  |  Lost Password?

Search

Advanced Search

Recent Posts

Who's Online

267 user(s) are online (202 user(s) are browsing Support Forums)

Members: 0

Guests: 267

more...

Donat-O-Meter

Stats
Goal: $100.00
Due Date: Apr 30
Gross Amount: $0.00
Net Balance: $0.00
Left to go: $100.00
Make donations with PayPal!

Latest GitHub Commits