25
Two things:
1. irmtfan - I suppose, you dotn't understand my last post.
I tested two versions of Voltan's module:
a) first called "news", which is installed on my XOOPS site, where I do not have the original old "news" ver. 1.66 installed - it allowed me to see most of the module functions... and problems,
b) second one, being a clone of the first (it was named: "fmcontent"). This clone was prepared in first website and copied and installed in another XOOPS site, in which I have the original old "news" module, but there isn't Voltan's "news" module installed.
2. This is a good time to do one thing.
Voltan could try to clone his module with a generic name (testnews, fmcontent2 or testcontent) and install it in an empty, test XOOPS site. In this way, he will be able to detect all wrong parts of the code (hardcoded too) and make the "clone" such functional as his "news".
This would enable to create this module really clonable and to increase a group of testers. And also allow posting changes to
http://xoops.svn.sourceforge.net/ not only in branches/news, but in branches/"clone-testversion" - having standalone "clone" will be good for testers with only one webside and old "news" module installed.