11
cheechon
Re: Xoops 2.13 not 2.0.13, Should i downgrade it or keep it?
  • 2006/4/27 16:06

  • cheechon

  • Just popping in

  • Posts: 60

  • Since: 2005/2/25


I have a backup copy at 2.0.9.2 . so now do i need to upload the 2.0.9.2to2.0.10 patch to the server 1st or i can simply replace/overwrite the file on my pc 1st (patch by patch) than only upload the final patch to the server?

Do i need to update the database after each patch?

12
rowdie
Re: Xoops 2.13 not 2.0.13, Should i downgrade it or keep it?
  • 2006/4/27 17:25

  • rowdie

  • Just can't stay away

  • Posts: 846

  • Since: 2004/7/21


There is no reason to downgrade a working 2.2 site. It is a supported version, and there will be an upgrade path to the next version.

Rowd

13
Will_H
Re: Xoops 2.13 not 2.0.13, Should i downgrade it or keep it?
  • 2006/4/27 17:29

  • Will_H

  • Friend of XOOPS

  • Posts: 1786

  • Since: 2004/10/10


could have sworn i wrapped this up on page 1

14
cheechon
Re: Xoops 2.13 not 2.0.13, Should i downgrade it or keep it?
  • 2006/4/28 0:42

  • cheechon

  • Just popping in

  • Posts: 60

  • Since: 2005/2/25


Thanks guys!

Now I have 2 version, 2.0.13.2 as recommended and 2.2 final for 2 different sites. Let see how different the two site will be.

Login

Who's Online

345 user(s) are online (276 user(s) are browsing Support Forums)


Members: 0


Guests: 345


more...

Donat-O-Meter

Stats
Goal: $100.00
Due Date: Nov 30
Gross Amount: $0.00
Net Balance: $0.00
Left to go: $100.00
Make donations with PayPal!

Latest GitHub Commits