83
vaughan
Re: Proposal: Towards A Sustainable Open Source Project
  • 2007/10/27 19:28

  • vaughan

  • Friend of XOOPS

  • Posts: 680

  • Since: 2005/11/26


Quote:

Mamba wrote:
vaughan wrote:
Quote:

Damaster, it's you who create negativeness..

And unfortunately, you're contributing to it as well by your comments. Please focus on the task at hand, be professional, and move all personal fights to private emails.

We don't have to agree on everything, but calling people names doesn't really belong here. And I don't really care who started it - it's time to move on...


i call it damage limitation.

why would i not voice my concerns in public when a person (Damaster) has in the past (and maybe still continuing to do so) has/is accessing other peoples user accounts and has used them in the past to post malicious content and grief by pretending to be the person who's account he was using because of illegally obtained passwords? please tell me why that is being negative, that same dishonest person has just been nominated to be on a XOOPS committee by yourself and other people.

and you expect me to be quiet?

84
seth_sd
Re: Proposal: Towards A Sustainable Open Source Project
  • 2007/10/27 19:31

  • seth_sd

  • Friend of XOOPS

  • Posts: 158

  • Since: 2004/11/9


Quote:
My name was suggested, I would like to accept the invitation please


Cool.
"Why can't we have a car powered on a mixture of patchouli oil, ignorance, and double standards? There seems to be an inexhaustible supply of that sh1t." - LR

85
seth_sd
Re: Proposal: Towards A Sustainable Open Source Project
  • 2007/10/27 19:37

  • seth_sd

  • Friend of XOOPS

  • Posts: 158

  • Since: 2004/11/9


Quote:

vaughan wrote:
Quote:

Mamba wrote:
vaughan wrote:
Quote:

Damaster, it's you who create negativeness..

And unfortunately, you're contributing to it as well by your comments. Please focus on the task at hand, be professional, and move all personal fights to private emails.

We don't have to agree on everything, but calling people names doesn't really belong here. And I don't really care who started it - it's time to move on...


i call it damage limitation.

why would i not voice my concerns in public when a person (Damaster) has in the past (and maybe still continuing to do so) has/is accessing other peoples user accounts and has used them in the past to post malicious content and grief by pretending to be the person who's account he was using because of illegally obtained passwords? please tell me why that is being negative, that same dishonest person has just been nominated to be on a XOOPS committee by yourself and other people.

and you expect me to be quiet?


Based on the facts being true I don't think there is anyway a reasonable group of people would accept somebody with those credentials on a council that is working to make this project functional.

Having said that, I do believe he gets satisfaction out of your responses.
"Why can't we have a car powered on a mixture of patchouli oil, ignorance, and double standards? There seems to be an inexhaustible supply of that sh1t." - LR

86
vaughan
Re: Proposal: Towards A Sustainable Open Source Project
  • 2007/10/27 19:42

  • vaughan

  • Friend of XOOPS

  • Posts: 680

  • Since: 2005/11/26


if it's to be democratic, if people vote for him because someone stupidly nominated him, then well if he was voted ever voted in? then what?

the fact is, he shouldn't be on this site because of those actions in order to be nominated in the 1st place.

87
BlueStocking
Re: Proposal: Towards A Sustainable Open Source Project

Dammit Vaughan,
quit hijacking the thread...

either accept the nonimation or not

@Sail,
@DJ,
please remove this off topic garbage.
I am trying to keep up with the threads actual goal.
hhttps://xoops.org/modules/repository .. It is time to get involved - XOOPS.ORG

88
vaughan
Re: Proposal: Towards A Sustainable Open Source Project
  • 2007/10/27 19:56

  • vaughan

  • Friend of XOOPS

  • Posts: 680

  • Since: 2005/11/26


who hijacked the thread?

Damaster was nominated.

i voiced my concerns over his nomination due to his dishonest nature & the fact he has no interest in XOOPS at all except as a playground, he would rather see XOOPS Cube succeed because he thinks XOOPS Cube is superior to XOOPS and he doesn't like XOOPS because of that. that is relevant to this thread in my opinion.

89
BlueStocking
Re: Proposal: Towards A Sustainable Open Source Project

You don't have to be so #OOPS# redundant about it...
I don't see yours or Damasters name on the acceptance list.

So get off it!!!

...darcy
hhttps://xoops.org/modules/repository .. It is time to get involved - XOOPS.ORG

90
Mamba
Re: Proposal: Towards A Sustainable Open Source Project
  • 2007/10/27 20:02

  • Mamba

  • Moderator

  • Posts: 11378

  • Since: 2004/4/23


vaughan wrote:
Quote:

who hijacked the thread?

Damaster was nominated.

i voiced my concerns over his nomination due to his dishonest nature & the fact he has no interest in XOOPS at all except as a playground, he would rather see XOOPS Cube succeed because he thinks XOOPS Cube is superior to XOOPS and he doesn't like XOOPS because of that. that is relevant to this thread in my opinion.

Calling people names is NOT relevant to this thread!

If you have concerns, please state them, provide the facts, and be professional about it.
Support XOOPS => DONATE
Use 2.5.10 | Docs | Modules | Bugs

91
Mamba
Re: Proposal: Towards A Sustainable Open Source Project
  • 2007/10/27 20:03

  • Mamba

  • Moderator

  • Posts: 11378

  • Since: 2004/4/23


catzwolf_ wrote:
Quote:

My name was suggested, I would like to accept the invitation please.


Same here. I would like to accept the invitation as well.
Support XOOPS => DONATE
Use 2.5.10 | Docs | Modules | Bugs

92
vaughan
Re: Proposal: Towards A Sustainable Open Source Project
  • 2007/10/27 20:08

  • vaughan

  • Friend of XOOPS

  • Posts: 680

  • Since: 2005/11/26


see the server hacking thread for evidence, more evidence to what i posted last time when i requested his banning. this time, someone else actually did some research (giba) in providing more proof. but i don't need to list the proof to the management, because they already know of Damasters antics.

the message being pushed out is "hackers & crackers are very welcome to participate on this site and they can use other peoples accounts and use illegally obtained passwords for their pleasure, the XOOPS management will embrace you all the way for doing it"

not good advertisement at all. he should be punished and banned. so i state again.. i publically call for Damaster to be banned for unauthorised use of peoples accounts, and for blatant flaming and malicious posting. the proof is all on this site already.

to quote from terms of use (paragraph 9, item 2)

Quote:

(2) abuse of site resources or attempt to gain unauthorized entry to the site or site resources; (3) use of an XOOPS site in a manner inconsistent with the purpose;


is that not what he did on numerous occasions, or does using other peoples accounts without permission from illegally obtained password hashes NOT constitute a breech of that?

Login

Who's Online

482 user(s) are online (65 user(s) are browsing Support Forums)


Members: 0


Guests: 482


more...

Donat-O-Meter

Stats
Goal: $100.00
Due Date: Jul 31
Gross Amount: $0.00
Net Balance: $0.00
Left to go: $100.00
Make donations with PayPal!

Latest GitHub Commits