21
ok cool, glad we're not arguing.
I'm not an expert on GPL
Smarty is still licensed under the GNU?
I know some people look at this as a grey area.
Quote:
If I have to write my new themes in PHP then I will, if that will make you see that the code has nothing to do with xoops. My themes aren't event based off of XOOPS default themes. I am not sure where anyone got the idea that code could not fall under a private license. It is an original work.
You don't have to make me see anything, I honestly respect what you say, and fully understand where your coming from, if you specifically asked me not to do something with your theme, then I'd personally comply.
When I was talking about the code being derived, again only my interpretation but if it uses gpl code to function then it's derived, I honestly don't know where that lines drawn between what's classed as derived and what's not, because technically in my eyes, if you made the theme as a stand-a-lone html template and licensed it, then later XOOPS'd it, in theory it's an original piece that was converted, so the original licence would have to remain.
I don't know...............
I think Herko's had more experience with the GPL and the law, perhaps if he see's this he could give the foundation lawyer/solicitors version, as they would be better verse in the legalities.
Or if anyone else here has a legal background perhaps they could drop us a note.