Support Forums - All Posts - XOOPS Web Application System

41

Re: TinyEditor module development quitted

2007/6/8 10:40
smart2
Not too shy to talk
Posts: 129
Since: 2007/1/19

As he posted on 2007/6/7 21:51, I understand that he won't.

Hope I'm wrong because I always use this an excellent module much needed by xoops.

I understand you Ralf57, It's a shame as much cool contributors were loosed.
Phppp gives me great hopes but I will wait a little to involve more.

42

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Xoops-France is joining the Xoops-Cube Project

2007/6/7 0:12
smart2
Not too shy to talk
Posts: 129
Since: 2007/1/19

+1

43

Re: Xoops 2.0.17 released (Unofficial version) by Hervé

2007/6/5 19:55
smart2
Not too shy to talk
Posts: 129
Since: 2007/1/19

@Mcdonald

Thank you for making things move anymore interesting ideas?

I don't see this as "MY" google group as I have other things to do than try to make things move on.
If it seems it's not useful, there's no problem with that I don't care I just try to do something maybe you should try.
Maybe you should do some knitting site to use better your time.

I post in english because I dont speek dutch neither portuguese neither greek etc etc.

Maybe If I had done this in esperanto it could have pleased you.

If this doesn't please you, it's you're right, and your not obliged to come, just stay away.

Some other XOOPS contributors don't see this as something bad and understand much better than you do the target of this initiative.

44

Re: Xoops 2.0.17 released (Unofficial version) by Hervé

2007/6/5 18:00
smart2
Not too shy to talk
Posts: 129
Since: 2007/1/19

Quote:

I believe from the insight I've seen, in this instance, it's not a joke

It made me laught but I'm glad to see it was not intended.

Still waiting for Skalpa to express himself

45

Re: Xoops 2.0.17 released (Unofficial version) by Hervé

2007/6/5 11:10
smart2
Not too shy to talk
Posts: 129
Since: 2007/1/19

Quote:

Smart2, why make a seperate group on google instead of discussing things on the XOOPS forum? We are all XOOPS users. People may have different opinions but this is the place to find out.

Only because its a neutal zone, where evrybody envolved with XOOPS will be able to talk constructively without fearing any abusive post deletion, in which every XOOPS like users are welcome to make XOOPS get better instead of Dying.

Quote:

UPDATE: THE NEWS ITEM HAS BEEN POSTED ALREADY
Newsletter: article on XOOPS developments

Happy to see that after so much warnings you are beginining to communicate a bit, maybe a bit long anyway.

Quote:

What worries me is that there is no response from the core developers on things that require a response, like how the bugfixes as offered in this unofficial release will be implemented into the official XOOPS releases? On that point I can understand why fellow XOOPS users are worried.

That is the biggest problem. what the hell is doing Skalpa?
We can't hear a word about him. Will you at list publish an interview if he's to busy to express himself directly?

Quote:

The XOOPS Dev Team is requesting that the community gets involved and participates, there are still numerous bugs waiting to be fixed or reviewed on the Sourceforge site. Your help is welcome.

Is it a joke?

46

Re: Xoops 2.0.17 released (Unofficial version) by Hervé

2007/6/5 9:24
smart2
Not too shy to talk
Posts: 129
Since: 2007/1/19

I've created a public google group to give a place for this discussion and to coordinate XOOPS users efforts who want the project to move on.

All XOOPS contributors, local support team, who want to make XOOPS move on instead of dying may come to talk with respect in that public space.

http://groups.google.fr/group/xoops-union

A XOOPS user who can't stay waiting for XOOPS to die.

47

Re: Xoops 2.0.17 released (Unofficial version) by Hervé

2007/6/5 6:57
smart2
Not too shy to talk
Posts: 129
Since: 2007/1/19

Someone from the dev team here?
Where are you?
We really need answers, this is not a flamming post but a very serious one, please consider it as it must be.

48

Re: Xoops 2.0.17 released (Unofficial version) by Hervé

2007/6/4 18:09
smart2
Not too shy to talk
Posts: 129
Since: 2007/1/19

Quote:

PREVENTION is still better than cure!!

Everybody will agree on that point with you vaughan.

Anyway, cure is better than NOTHING...

I'm not the ony one who worries about XOOPS future.

I can't understand such a lack of communication from the project "manager" and its team.

I'm a great XOOPS supporter and I try since I use it to promote it and to contribute as much as I can, but I must say you that professional uses of XOOPS need the XOOPS team a more professional way to consider its contributors and supporters.

Do we deserve some consideration or not?

Thousands of users, contributors, members of foreigns support site are asking the same question, don't it make you think you're on the wrong way?

Will you publish an article for us to know if we can trust XOOPS team or not, and if we can support XOOPS for professional uses?

If not just tell me.

Is Skalpa still here or has he left, because we can't see him answer to those serious questions anywhere.

I must say that if the project manager is invisible for more than a few days, a lot of professional users of XOOPS will be forced to leave the project as they have responsabilitie for their clients and can't make them choose XOOPS in such conditions.

Foreign communities have taken their responsabilities by explaining their point of view officially, will xoops.org do the same or continue to act as everything was fine?

Still hoping XOOPS is going to go back on the road.

49

Re: Xoops 2.0.17 released (Unofficial version) by Hervé

2007/6/3 18:37
smart2
Not too shy to talk
Posts: 129
Since: 2007/1/19

[sorry for poor english]

Many thanks to Hervé to try to make things move and to work hard trying to improve this branch of Xoops.

A part of my activity is to sell service around XOOPS and to promote it to entreprises and administrations.

I must say that since some weeks, I'm wondering if I'm giving good advices to those by making them choose XOOPS for their business websites.

I have got the feeling that the voices of people like me who are trying to help XOOPS to develop in professionnal sphere, as much as they can are not heard.

I have some modules projets which are now on standby, just because I can't see clearly where XOOPS is going.

From now I'm waiting for the XOOPS project team to inform us clearly about what is happening. I can really understand that this is not easy ... the only thing I can't understand is why people who work hard to make XOOPS get better are ignored.

Why don't you consider such contributions? From my point of view they help xoops.

If I'm wrong could you explain me why.

[/sorry for poor english]

50

Re: Clientspace 2.0 Beta is available (mini crm)

2007/6/3 0:02
smart2
Not too shy to talk
Posts: 129
Since: 2007/1/19

Thanks any bug seen for you?

Stats
Goal:	$100.00
Due Date:	May 31
Gross Amount:	$0.00
Net Balance:	$0.00
Left to go:	$100.00

Forum Index

Re: TinyEditor module development quitted

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Xoops-France is joining the Xoops-Cube Project

Re: Xoops 2.0.17 released (Unofficial version) by Hervé

Re: Xoops 2.0.17 released (Unofficial version) by Hervé

Re: Xoops 2.0.17 released (Unofficial version) by Hervé

Re: Xoops 2.0.17 released (Unofficial version) by Hervé

Re: Xoops 2.0.17 released (Unofficial version) by Hervé

Re: Xoops 2.0.17 released (Unofficial version) by Hervé

Re: Xoops 2.0.17 released (Unofficial version) by Hervé

Re: Clientspace 2.0 Beta is available (mini crm)

Login

Search

Recent Posts

Re: Rebuilding and Updating a 20 years old Xoops Website from 2.0.18? to 2.5.11

Rebuilding and Updating a 20 years old Xoops Website from 2.0.18? to 2.5.11

Re: NewBB v 5.1.0 b 6

Re: NewBB v 5.1.0 b 6

NewBB v 5.1.0 b 6

Re: XOOPS 2.5.11 search user is not working

Re: oledrion

Re: oledrion

Re: oledrion

Re: oledrion

Who's Online

Donat-O-Meter

Latest GitHub Commits

{{ record.sha.slice(0, 7) }} - {{ record.commit.message | truncate }}