XOOPS 
Forum
Forum Index General Forums Community Support Modules Support Themes Support Development International Support Module Hack Reviews Theme Designer Talk


« 1 ... 176 177 178 (179) 180 181 182 ... 185 »


1781
Catzwolf
Re: NewBB Problem?

  • 2003/7/17 15:17

  • Catzwolf

  • Home away from home

  • Posts: 1392

  • Since: 2007/9/30


Turn on php debugging and see if there is any error warning shown, if so copy and paste it here. This may give a better idea of what is going on.
Topic | Forum


1782
Catzwolf
Re: WF-Sections V1 Released

  • 2003/7/8 22:45

  • Catzwolf

  • Home away from home

  • Posts: 1392

  • Since: 2007/9/30


Quote:

techgnome wrote:
Should any one want to see what wfSections can do, follow the link in my sig to DeveloperKB.com.... click the KB Articles link in the menu.


IMHO, This is probably the heavest use of WF-Section I have ever seen on a website and probably the best place to go if you want to see WF-Section in Action.

Tech:

Question on the WYSIWYG, does the editor work as it should? ie Am I getting closer with what you write is what you see in the article?
Topic | Forum


1783
Catzwolf
Re: WF-Sections V1 Released

  • 2003/7/8 22:42

  • Catzwolf

  • Home away from home

  • Posts: 1392

  • Since: 2007/9/30


Quote:

Reosys wrote:
Hey Catzwolf!!!
Good Work!!!

Can I use the module in a production site?
Or i must wait anytime to use this and make cosmetic modifications.

Sorry for my english.
GreatGReatGREatGREAtGREAT Module, thx.

The best political site!!!


Yes, WF-Section can now be used on a production site.

So far I have had very little bug feedback on the last two versions, which is good for me

To answer the question when the next stable version will be released? Soon, very soon!
Topic | Forum


1784
Catzwolf
Re: time to say goodbye to newbb?

  • 2003/7/8 2:23

  • Catzwolf

  • Home away from home

  • Posts: 1392

  • Since: 2007/9/30


Destrux:

When I was updating the newBB forum, I actually made no changes to the core but the Database was modified heavily.

Infact, my whole purpose was to have the version I was working on updatable with IBF and newBB (the DB structure was taken form IBF orginally).

I would still like to update newBB to the same standard or as near as IBF, site stats etc and I was trying to get as close to that standard as much as my coding (then) would permit me.

I may have another crack at this, as I still have my original code there and I believe I could transfer this across to the XOOPS 2 version of newBB.
Topic | Forum


1785
Catzwolf
Re: time to say goodbye to newbb?

  • 2003/7/8 2:15

  • Catzwolf

  • Home away from home

  • Posts: 1392

  • Since: 2007/9/30


I do apologise on my term is buggy as hell, I mean't to say 'it was as buggy as hell'. My thoughts and feeling on this is not a direct attack at Kush as he has done some excellent work on that module.

But in saying that, my reason for using it still stands.
Topic | Forum


1786
Catzwolf
Re: time to say goodbye to newbb?

  • 2003/7/7 23:11

  • Catzwolf

  • Home away from home

  • Posts: 1392

  • Since: 2007/9/30


Quote:

chapi wrote:
I also like the newbb very much, because it is well integrated into the core! By installing one of the other forums you always have to mess with the core files too.

Why not enhance the newbb or create a newbb2? Maybe this is a task for the xmdt ?


I was halfway through enhancing newbb for XOOPS version 1 and I was thinging about continuing this for XOOPS version 2.

Most of the work is there and could be easily hacked into newbb for xoops2 but it would take me a while. I may try and get a few people to help me on this one.
Topic | Forum


1787
Catzwolf
Re: time to say goodbye to newbb?

  • 2003/7/7 23:06

  • Catzwolf

  • Home away from home

  • Posts: 1392

  • Since: 2007/9/30


I have just read through this thread and a couple of things I need to point out to everyone regarding this subject.

First, the IBF forum for XOOPS is buggy as hell (Sorry kush) and the original forum was not released under GNU.

This means that kush had to get permission from the original author (thats why the was removed from modcentral) and even if the XOOPS core team wantd to use it instead of newBB, they can't.

So far, every forum that I have used that has been made into a module has issues, this is due to the changes to the core (come time for an update! Need I say more) and that has always been a problem for me.

Ok, So newbb is not the best forum out there and lacks many functions that other forums take for granted, but the one point about this module is the fact you do not have to hack at the core to get it to work.

As someone pointed out, it does use notifications which most forums would kill for.

At the end of the day, it is not about replacing newbb, but enhancing it with the features that people want or use third party hackons that require the author to update each time a new version of XOOPS comes out.
Topic | Forum


1788
Catzwolf
Re: WF-Sections V1 Released

  • 2003/7/7 22:48

  • Catzwolf

  • Home away from home

  • Posts: 1392

  • Since: 2007/9/30


Quote:

nautis wrote:
catz -

thanks for your response. i gave that a shot and no luck. in fact, i deleted the entire wfsection_article.html file and it still nothing worked. i even deleted everything in templates_c in case it was caching. still didn't work. could this code be contained a little deeper in the logic?

- nautis


Ok, first rule when changing a template file is always to update the module afterwards, there was no need to delete the whole file.

The wfsection_article.html file contains every bit of info that you do not want and deleting the correct items should have done it. Thats if you updated the module afterwards.

download this file and overwrite the original file (wfsections/templates/) and then update wfsections from module admin. This should get rid of all the info that you wanted.

You can then compare both files to see what was removed for future reference
Topic | Forum


1789
Catzwolf
Re: WF-Sections V1 Released

  • 2003/7/7 18:25

  • Catzwolf

  • Home away from home

  • Posts: 1392

  • Since: 2007/9/30


Quote:

nautis wrote:
catz -

got another quick question for you. i have pretty much gotten the module where i want it. i am only using a fraction of the functionality provided though. i am stuck on a couple of points and have included a screen shot below. i am trying to eliminate the the chunks of text i have circled. no luck. help.

- matthew


You can remove the reference to them in wfsection\templates\wfsection_article.html
Topic | Forum


1790
Catzwolf
Re: WF-Sections V1 Released

  • 2003/7/7 18:21

  • Catzwolf

  • Home away from home

  • Posts: 1392

  • Since: 2007/9/30


Quote:

bosello wrote:
<select name='id' onchange="location.href='http://www.*********.com/x/html/modules/wfsection/index.php?category='+this.options[this.selectedIndex].value">
<option value='0'>-----------</option>
<br />
<b>Fatal error</b>: Undefined class name 'xoopsmodule' in <b>/home/*********/public_html/x/html/modules/wfsection/class/wfstree.php</b> on line <b>199</b><br />

I asked to show on the left the item "WF-Section Topics".

About my "weight" issue: i don't want to order also the articles by weight, but only categories and subcategories.



change that line to //$xoopsModule = XoopsModule::getByDirname("wfsection"); and see what happens?
Topic | Forum



TopTop
« 1 ... 176 177 178 (179) 180 181 182 ... 185 »



[Advanced Search]

Login

Register now!  |  Lost Password?

Search

Advanced Search

Recent Posts

Who's Online

189 user(s) are online (141 user(s) are browsing Support Forums)

Members: 0

Guests: 189

more...

Donat-O-Meter

Stats
Goal: $100.00
Due Date: May 31
Gross Amount: $0.00
Net Balance: $0.00
Left to go: $100.00
Make donations with PayPal!

Latest GitHub Commits