| Re: XOOPS scalability |
| by LazyBadger on 2005/7/21 15:13:02 Quote:
XOOPS with what? forum? Yes, not so active - rather small (significantly less than 100 posting per day) Quote: news? 1 new on a month or longer Quote: FAQ? downloads? Yes Quote: ...just lots of viewing? Quote: With a decent server you can do a lot. Two DualXeon 2.4 with 2G memory Quote:
|
| Re: XOOPS scalability |
| by birdseed on 2005/7/21 14:27:03 Hi Xoops and scalability IS a problem in my opinion. When I have a look at the xoops2 core, i don´t know if i should cry or be happy. The functionality is good, the core is well structured, but I would wish that more developers would take time to use a zend debugger and take the one or two hours which it takes to step through the code. There are so many features where the OOP Concept was pushed without caring for performance. The XoopsObject, The Criteria/CriteriaCompo. The smarty core is a hell of function calls simply to load a template, which could be a simple file include plus some checks and assignments. We have many XOOPS modules. I like xoops, but I´m not happy what some of the developers made of it. :( greetings MK |
| Re: XOOPS scalability |
| by Herko on 2005/7/21 13:59:09 300.000 hits/day? XOOPS with what? forum? news? shoutbox? FAQ? downloads? lots of interaction? or just lots of viewing? With a decent server you can do a lot. XOOPS.org gets over 100.000 hits/day (not visitors, that's about 10.000), and we have not the biggest of servers (dual celeron 700 mhz wih 1.5 GB RAM). It is recoomended to do a lot of server tweaking tho, and using a PHP accelerator helps too. Using XOOPS caching also helps, but it depends on what you cache (and more importantly what is not cached) if this is a big influence on performance. Herko |
| Re: XOOPS scalability |
| by LazyBadger on 2005/7/21 13:55:33 ? |
| Re: XOOPS scalability |
| by LazyBadger on 2005/7/21 5:35:00 ?! |