| Re: Gzip compression really working ? |
| by kotis on 2005/3/31 21:19:31 Quote:
thank you, thank you, thank you... that really saved me... |
| Re: Gzip compression really working ? |
| by RachelVirago on 2005/3/23 8:33:06 Just when you thought it was the end of the thread! As an afterthought, Using the test sites given at the start of thread I notice that xoops.org is not using compression and does rather badly in these tests.
|
| Re: Gzip compression really working ? |
| by RachelVirago on 2005/3/23 0:55:57 Quote:
This works for but good! Huge increase in performance. Elegant solution for my virtual server thanks. |
| Re: Gzip compression really working ? |
| by ideiafacil on 2005/2/25 1:58:28 Any info about this in XOOPS 2.0.9.2? One more question: Any data about how much performance is gain in Turck MMcache system in a XOOPS website? Any benchmark test? |
| Re: Gzip compression really working ? |
| by ajaxbr on 2004/12/1 11:42:33 Quote:
![]() Perhaps a little note can be included in 2.0.9 to let users know gzip needs tweaking (instead of simply clicking on "enable")? I've stoped trying to enable it after some problems I believed were related to it (using the .htaccess method). |