| Re: Xoops 2.6.0 alpha 3 issues |
| by Mamba on 2014/1/8 10:30:08 Quote: I also think that composer is a nice tool but a cms should be easy to install. With or without Composer, XOOPS should be easy to install, that's a given  But let's see if there is a way to have Composer in the background as part of the Installer, in a way that the user is not even aware of it.... |
| Re: Xoops 2.6.0 alpha 3 issues |
| by heyula on 2014/1/8 9:43:00 Quote:
+1 |
| Re: Xoops 2.6.0 alpha 3 issues |
| by Bleekk on 2014/1/8 9:34:50 I also think that composer is a nice tool but a cms should be easy to install. Composer should be a optional feature |
| Re: Xoops 2.6.0 alpha 3 issues |
| by tatane on 2014/1/8 9:31:14 Quote:
+1 |
| Re: Xoops 2.6.0 alpha 3 issues |
| by redheadedrod on 2014/1/8 9:26:59 Personally I think REQUIRING composer to install xoops is a bad decision. It works (sort of) while under development but it will be a cause for much grief moving forward. A package that a user installs must be seamless and include everything. I could be wrong but until composer is a default inclusion in PHP I think it is a very bad decision to force people to install composer in order to use xoops. I don't think it is a bad idea to include the code with the installation so someone could update the included packages if they want but 90% of the users that are going to want to install xoops will not want to fuss with having to have to install something else first and it will be a very big and continuous support issue. |
Search
Recent Posts
Who's Online
Donat-O-Meter
| Stats | |
| Goal: | $15.00 |
| Due Date: | Jul 31 |
| Gross Amount: | $0.00 |
| Net Balance: | $0.00 |
| Left to go: | $15.00 |
|
|