| Re: eXtGallery idea. does this make sense? |
| by raymia on 2008/10/1 14:44:39 well i think i have found another gallery that works like i want to. Coppermine. it is exactly what i mean. you can upload pics to different batch folders. and you can choose multiple folders to upload some files. that's what i meant. Coppermine is the answer |
| Re: eXtGallery idea. does this make sense? |
| by raymia on 2008/9/29 9:14:21 it takes a lot of time. must be able to go alot faster. |
| Re: eXtGallery idea. does this make sense? |
| by pacho on 2008/9/26 15:49:03 Yes, xoopsgallery is just an interface and inside engine folder you have to upload Gallery and size is very big. There are differents version size, some smaller. When I tested I upload xoopsgallery without engine contents and then uploads last Gallery version inside this folder. It tooks too much time! 
|
| Re: eXtGallery idea. does this make sense? |
| by raymia on 2008/9/26 11:14:49 thanks zoullou and pacho. XOOPS gallery isn't working for me. i'm trying to use it but it is such a big file that uploading to the root is taking hours. it's 13.5 mb but when i uploaded it to ftp Commander it said that it has more than 21 mb. |
| Re: eXtGallery idea. does this make sense? |
| by pacho on 2008/9/26 5:31:10 Quote:
I think this is a high level feature. I have seen something similar only from Gallery. It uses many ways to upload multiple files (pictures,videos,etc), one is through explorer (Windows) or F-Spot (Ubuntu) in "simple" way. xoopsgallery module provides the interface but it is not a final version. Anyway, I love to use extGallery as it is. |
Search
Recent Posts
Who's Online
Donat-O-Meter
| Stats | |
| Goal: | $15.00 |
| Due Date: | Jul 31 |
| Gross Amount: | $0.00 |
| Net Balance: | $0.00 |
| Left to go: | $15.00 |
|
|